[PATCH] jbd: wait for already submitted t_sync_datalist buffer to complete

Hi. In the current jbd code, if a buffer on BJ_SyncData list is dirty and not locked, the buffer is refiled to BJ_Locked list, submitted to the IO and waited for IO completion. But the fsstress test showed the case that when a buffer was already submitted to the IO just before the

Re: [PATCH -mm] gfs2 lock function parameter

Hi, I've put this in the -nmw git tree. I'd pull it into the -fixes tree too, but its probably better to let Linus take whats there first and then I'll send this on later, Steve. On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 22:29 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fix function

Re: NFSv4/pNFS possible POSIX I/O API standards

On Nov 29, 2006 09:04 +, Christoph Hellwig wrote: - readdirplus This one is completely unneeded as a kernel API. Doing readdir plus calls on the wire makes a lot of sense and we already do that for NFSv3+. Doing this at the syscall layer just means kernel

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] Extent base online defrag

Hi, I tried to use defrag utility. But these are the results that, I got: [EMAIL PROTECTED] e4defrag]# ./defrag /dev/hda8 Start defragment for device(/dev/hda8) Total: 393 Success: 0 Failure: 393 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: NFSv4/pNFS possible POSIX I/O API standards

On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 09:04:50AM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote: - openg/sutoc No way. We already have a very nice file descriptor abstraction. You can pass file descriptors over unix sockets just fine. Yes, but it behaves like dup(). Gary replied to me off-list (which I

Re: NFSv4/pNFS possible POSIX I/O API standards

On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 05:23:13AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 09:04:50AM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote: - openg/sutoc No way. We already have a very nice file descriptor abstraction. You can pass file descriptors over unix sockets just fine. Yes,

Re: NFSv4/pNFS possible POSIX I/O API standards

At 05:35 AM 11/29/2006, Matthew Wilcox wrote: On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 05:23:13AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 09:04:50AM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote: - openg/sutoc No way. We already have a very nice file descriptor abstraction. You can pass file

Re: Get your medircations ONLINE id 206173

Hallo. Die Mailingliste [EMAIL PROTECTED] ist umgezogen, da sie durch Spams verseucht wurde. Siehe https://mlists.in-berlin.de/mailman/listinfo/linux-avmb1 The mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] was been moved, we got too many spams. Visit https://mlists.in-berlin.de/mailman/listinfo/linux-avmb1

Re: NFSv4/pNFS possible POSIX I/O API standards

Please don't repeat the stupid marketroid speach. If you want this to go anywhere please get someone with an actual clue to talk to us instead of you. Thanks a lot. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-fsdevel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More

Re: NFSv4/pNFS possible POSIX I/O API standards

On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 10:18:42AM +, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: To take NTFS as an example I know something about, the directory entry caches the a/c/m time as well as the data file size (needed for ls) and the allocated on disk file size (needed for du) as well as the inode number

[patch 0/3] more buffered write fixes

Sorry, I should give some background. The following patches attempt to fix the problems people have identified with buffered write deadlock patches. Against 2.6.19 + the previous patchset dropped from -mm. Comments? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-fsdevel in the

Re: Re:[RFC][PATCH 0/3] Extent base online defrag

Hello, On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 23:39 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Thank you for your trial and report of the result! Hi, I tried to use defrag utility. But these are the results that, I got: [EMAIL PROTECTED] e4defrag]# ./defrag /dev/hda8 Start defragment for