Hi!
It looks much cleaner than my previous approaches. There seems to be
something strange with usage counts:
pavel@bug:/tmp/cz1_mbrola.tgz#utar$ ls -al
total 88
drwxr-xr-x 2 pavelusers3586 Mar 26 18:43 ./
drwxrwxrwt 38 root root81920 Jul 24 09:57 ../
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 04:34:11PM -0400, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
I build some customized kernel rpm's for our inhouse distro and I've
incorporated the profiling patches to use the sard utility. I'm just
curious if there is any downside to using this patch for any reason and if
there are
Thank you very much!
-jeremy
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 04:34:11PM -0400, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
I build some customized kernel rpm's for our inhouse distro and I've
incorporated the profiling patches to use the sard utility. I'm just
curious if there is any downside to using this
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
Problems:
- The filesystem will be littered with these loopback mounts. This
should be cleared upon unmount, and possibly when the dcache is
shrunk. There was a similar requirement for new autofs IIRC.
- Creation/removal of virtual files are not handled by
