On Dec 6, 2007, at 1:49 AM, Rafe Slattery wrote:
thanks for the suggestion...
It helped ... a bit... but I'm still not quite there...
Can I get some clarificaton on what location constraints I should use.
I want an active/passive combo. 1 web to be running web services , 1
passive. 1 db to ru
On Dec 3, 2007, at 1:08 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 03:03:39PM -0800, En Zhu wrote:
Hello!
I'm very new with heartbeat. I just tried to create a
resource with ipaddr2 as the instruction from:
http://linux-ha.org/Education/Newbie/IPaddrScreencast
However, the re
On Dec 5, 2007, at 6:38 PM, China wrote:
Hi,
I've configured two machine with Linux-ha in Active/passive mode.
With v1
conf all is ok, instead with v2 conf there are the following
behaviours:
PC_A up with resource and PC_B up without resource
|
V
shu
On Dec 5, 2007, at 10:19 PM, Rois Cannon wrote:
Michael / all,
Any chance you figured out how to keep ha from going back to node1
without human intervention?
Rois
This is my dilemma:
I'm building a simple 2 node cluster, node1 and node2.
HA works fine so far.
If I issue "network stop" o
On Dec 5, 2007, at 1:44 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 11:51:20AM +0100, Franck Ganachaud wrote:
Well I don't want hearbeat to stop or start mysql.
You should be better off if you do. Otherwise, you'll probably
end up with an unmaintainable and complex configuratio
On Nov 30, 2007, at 7:39 PM, Art Age Software wrote:
Hi,
I'm setting up my first heartbeat cluster. (I have managed one in the
past, but never set one up from scratch before.) It is going well, but
I have a few questions:
1) In the log, the following sometimes appears during initial
heartbeat
On Nov 30, 2007, at 5:59 PM, Remigiusz Stachura wrote:
Hi,
I have created a simple two-node cluster with 2 multi-state drbd
resources on each node. I use DRBD 7.x and the most fresh HA 2.1.2-24
working on SLES10 SP1.
The only rules for my cluster I need are:
- resources must be promoted to mast
Hi,
I found something rule like this;
When the following process was killed, the system would reboot.
* ccm
* cib
* lrmd
* crmd
* pengine
* tengine
These processes would be restarted when they are killed.
* FIFO
* media (ex. write/read bcast)
* stonithd
* attrd
* mgmtd
* respawn (ex. pingd)
If m
Hi,
Clone resource have some instances like, clone:0, or :1.
Is it possible to handle them as one resource about a fail count on the same
node?
I mean, if clone:0 fails on node_a, I want to up a fail count for
clone:1/node_a at the same time.
or, is there any good idea to work out the above behavi
On Dec 6, 2007, at 9:54 AM, Junko IKEDA wrote:
Hi,
Clone resource have some instances like, clone:0, or :1.
Is it possible to handle them as one resource about a fail count on
the same
node?
I mean, if clone:0 fails on node_a, I want to up a fail count for
clone:1/node_a at the same time.
o
Ok, now it works, but when the PC_A returns up the resource doesn't remains
on PC_B and failback to PC_A.
How can I configure to switch the first time to PC_B on PC_A failover, but
not return back if PC_A returns UP?
Thanks
On Dec 6, 2007 9:14 AM, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On
China wrote:
Ok, now it works, but when the PC_A returns up the resource doesn't remains
on PC_B and failback to PC_A.
How can I configure to switch the first time to PC_B on PC_A failover, but
not return back if PC_A returns UP?
Set resource stickiness to a reasonable value.
Here's roughly ho
Ok, I've set resource_stickiness to 150, a score of 100 to the default node
PC_A and a score_attribute for pingd. Now the resource when fail doesn't
start on PC_B. Why?
On Dec 6, 2007 11:17 AM, Dominik Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> China wrote:
> > Ok, now it works, but when the PC_A returns
China wrote:
Ok, I've set resource_stickiness to 150, a score of 100 to the default node
PC_A and a score_attribute for pingd. Now the resource when fail doesn't
start on PC_B. Why?
The way I understand you, and please correct me or post your current
cib.xml, is:
pingd multiplier: 200 (as su
Got it.
Thank you very much.
Rafe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Beekhof
Sent: 06 December 2007 08:12
To: General Linux-HA mailing list
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] Setup Q
On Dec 6, 2007,
Hi,
I'm sure that I replied to this one, but...
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 09:32:20AM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On Nov 30, 2007, at 7:39 PM, Art Age Software wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm setting up my first heartbeat cluster. (I have managed one in the
>> past, but never set one up from scratch
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 05:10:28PM +1100, Amos Shapira wrote:
> On 05/12/2007, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 04:16:16AM +, Amos Shapira wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Has anyone got Heartbeat 1.2.5 to compile and run on CentOS 5?
> >
This is my new cib.xml:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 12:49:17AM -, Rafe Slattery wrote:
> thanks for the suggestion...
> It helped ... a bit... but I'm still not quite there...
> Can I get some clarificaton on what location constraints I should use.
> I want an active/passive combo. 1 web to be running web services
hi All,
There is a problem again. The cluster has two nodes, and heartbeat's
version is 2.1.2, CentOS 5.
This is the resource (this is the same for teszt2, both of them do not
work):
Constraints:
I start the reso
Hi
sorry I have to bother again about score calculation but I came across
something I don't understand and that might be a bug.
I have a master-slave drbd resource called ms-drbd (primitive is called
drbd2) and a group named testdb (4 primitives, "mount" being the first
primitive).
pingd mu
With this configuration the resources doesn't failover to test, but remains
on test-ppc. Why?
I can't say. The configuration looks good to me.
But again:
What are you doing to force the failure?
Do you really have just one connection between the nodes and unplug that
connection to force the
On 2007-12-05T21:06:38, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Over the last few months, Red Hat and SUSE engineers have been working
> together to port Heartbeat's powerful Cluster Resource Manager (CRM) to run
> natively on top of OpenAIS.
Credit where credit is due: this means you, Andr
Sorry, I forgot it!
I've two connection for the PCs:
one with crossover cable, where heartbeat send packets directly to other PC
one through network, where the services listen and where pingd test
connectivity
When I force the failure I disconnect the network cable that give services
from PC_A.
China wrote:
Sorry, I forgot it!
I've two connection for the PCs:
one with crossover cable, where heartbeat send packets directly to other PC
one through network, where the services listen and where pingd test
connectivity
When I force the failure I disconnect the network cable that give servi
But, It's good to use a interface both for heartbeat and for services?
It's pretty common I think.
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
Thanks for the tips both of you.
I'm going to work on that the next few days.
Andrew Beekhof a écrit :
On Dec 5, 2007, at 1:44 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 11:51:20AM +0100, Franck Ganachaud wrote:
Well I don't want hearbeat to stop or start mysql.
You should
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 10:54:36AM +1100, Amos Shapira wrote:
> On 06/12/2007, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We are in the final weeks of testing for release 2.1.3 - which has been
> > delayed to the week of Dec 19.
>
> Trying to do "make rpm" on CentOS 5 I get the following e
But, It's good to use a interface both for heartbeat and for services?
And yes, If I pull the heartbeat's cable I'm in a split brain situation. But
it's not my problem now :D
On Dec 6, 2007 2:23 PM, Dominik Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> China wrote:
> > Sorry, I forgot it!
> >
> > I've two
Last question: how can I see what is the node's score during cluster
execution?
On Dec 6, 2007 2:59 PM, Dominik Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But, It's good to use a interface both for heartbeat and for services?
>
> It's pretty common I think.
> ___
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 01:11:37PM +0100, Papp Tamas wrote:
> hi All,
>
>
> There is a problem again. The cluster has two nodes, and heartbeat's
> version is 2.1.2, CentOS 5.
>
> This is the resource (this is the same for teszt2, both of them do not
> work):
>
> id="stonith_teszt1">
>
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 05:42:10PM +0900, Junko IKEDA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found something rule like this;
> When the following process was killed, the system would reboot.
> * ccm
> * cib
> * lrmd
> * crmd
> * pengine
> * tengine
>
> These processes would be restarted when they are killed.
>
China wrote:
Last question: how can I see what is the node's score during cluster
execution?
You can grep it out of the "ptest" output.
Or use my script:
http://lists.community.tummy.com/pipermail/linux-ha/2007-September/027488.html
which has been updated by Robert Lindgren:
http://lists.comm
Hi,
We've been using OpenWbem on SUSE,
Heartbeat-cim will run with either, Pegasus is
preferred. There is a new release that runs
on SUSE - http://www.openpegasus.org/
Iirc the configure script tries to figure out which
devel package is installed (pegasus-devel
or openwbem-devel)
Hth,
Robert
>
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 07:43:44AM -0700, Robert Wipfel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've been using OpenWbem on SUSE,
> Heartbeat-cim will run with either, Pegasus is
> preferred. There is a new release that runs
> on SUSE - http://www.openpegasus.org/
> Iirc the configure script tries to figure out w
Thank you.
I've found the right score with the script:
pingd: +1000
PC_A: +100
resource_stickiness: +100 (I've 3 resources so make 300, not 100)
Now the problem is that i didn't understood why these score is ok for
failover and don't failback.
And why with pingd score 500 is good for failback to
On Dec 6, 2007, at 3:25 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 05:42:10PM +0900, Junko IKEDA wrote:
Hi,
I found something rule like this;
When the following process was killed, the system would reboot.
* ccm
* cib
* lrmd
* crmd
* pengine
* tengine
These processes would be
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 07:05:49PM +0100, Papp Tamas wrote:
> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>> The error you encountered is probably from the monitor operation
>> (there's a monitor implied in the start). Did you try with
>> stonith (the program):
>> # stonith -t apcsmart ttydev=/dev/ttyS0 hostlist
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
The error you encountered is probably from the monitor operation
(there's a monitor implied in the start). Did you try with
stonith (the program):
# stonith -t apcsmart ttydev=/dev/ttyS0 hostlist=teszt1 -S
# stonith -t apcsmart ttydev=/dev/ttyS0 hostlist=teszt1 -l
(per
Hi,
I'm new to Linux HA and I am already a bit puzzled by a few things. I have two
AMD64 Opteron machines (same hardware config) running SuSE 10.2 and HA. I
managed to configure HA using the GUI and all the wizards I managed to bump
into. It seems to work. The thing is I look at it like at a bl
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 07:43:20PM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 07:05:49PM +0100, Papp Tamas wrote:
> > Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> >> The error you encountered is probably from the monitor operation
> >> (there's a monitor implied in the start). Did you try wit
On Dec 6, 2007, at 5:15 PM, China wrote:
Thank you.
I've found the right score with the script:
pingd: +1000
PC_A: +100
resource_stickiness: +100 (I've 3 resources so make 300, not 100)
Now the problem is that i didn't understood why these score is ok for
failover and don't failback.
becaus
On Dec 6, 2007, at 1:39 PM, Dominik Klein wrote:
Hi
sorry I have to bother again about score calculation but I came
across something I don't understand and that might be a bug.
I have a master-slave drbd resource called ms-drbd (primitive is
called drbd2) and a group named testdb (4 prim
On 06/12/2007, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 05:10:28PM +1100, Amos Shapira wrote:
> > Would you be interested in the tiny diff's I had to make to the .spec
> > file? Are there maintenance released for v1?
>
> Yes. I think that it was Horms maintaini
On 05/12/2007, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 05:16:38PM +1100, Amos Shapira wrote:
> > On 30/11/2007, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 05:23:33PM +, Amos Shapira wrote:
> > > > On 29/11/2007
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 08:07:03PM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > This is also bad. Looks like it just checks the connection to the
> > APC, but not if the given host is reachable.
>
> Er, very silly of me to say that, because such a device (UPS)
> can't do that. Sorry for the confusion. What
On Dec 6, 2007, at 7:30 PM, Radu Handorean wrote:
Hi,
I'm new to Linux HA and I am already a bit puzzled by a few things.
I have two AMD64 Opteron machines (same hardware config) running
SuSE 10.2 and HA. I managed to configure HA using the GUI and all
the wizards I managed to bump into.
Junko IKEDA wrote:
Hi,
I found something rule like this;
When the following process was killed, the system would reboot.
* ccm
* cib
* lrmd
* crmd
* pengine
* tengine
These processes would be restarted when they are killed.
* FIFO
* media (ex. write/read bcast)
* stonithd
* attrd
* mgmtd
* resp
I have created a simple heartbeat cluster:
2 Centos 4.5 nodes
HB version:
heartbeat-pils-2.1.2-3.el4.centos
heartbeat-stonith-2.1.2-3.el4.centos
heartbeat-gui-2.1.2-3.el4.centos
heartbeat-2.1.2-3.el4.centos
Here is the issue I see, and I dont know what I am doing wrong.
I have a simple group
Good morning Andrew
sorry I have to bother again about score calculation but I came across
something I don't understand and that might be a bug.
I have a master-slave drbd resource called ms-drbd (primitive is
called drbd2) and a group named testdb (4 primitives, "mount" being
the first prim
On Dec 7, 2007, at 7:47 AM, Dominik Klein wrote:
Good morning Andrew
sorry I have to bother again about score calculation but I came
across something I don't understand and that might be a bug.
I have a master-slave drbd resource called ms-drbd (primitive is
called drbd2) and a group nam
Just curious: I suppose its my first constraint that does this job?
second - the colocation one
Okay thanks - so sure I even got the 50/50 wrong :p
Then I must ask another question: Why does this not apply to colocated
primitives?
I just tested with a single primitive (testdb) colocated to
52 matches
Mail list logo
