On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 01:38:30PM +0100, Jan-Michael Thölken wrote:
>
> Am 12.12.2007 um 03:59 schrieb Simon Horman:
>
> >>this works well with lditectord. The Problem occurs only with mysql :(
> >
> >Can you confirm that mysql will accept connections to the VIP?
> >Perhaps it only accepting con
Hello,
I have just gone from Hearbeat v1 to v2, largely because I needed the autojoin
feature. I simply converted my haresources file to a cib.xml with the
haresources2cib.py conversion script. I've figured out a few things, but there
are other things that I haven't found answers to yet. Please
Hi,
2007/12/13, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 06:45:48PM -, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > My Xen RA wasn't working as it should, due to the fact that it's
> > Xen_Status() function expects output differently.
> >
> > I've found on t
Thank you for replying, Andrew and Dejan. And I understand the rule.
2007/12/13, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:45:46AM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >
> > On Dec 12, 2007, at 7:41 AM, DAIKI MATSUDA wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, All.
> >>
> >> I recently make ow
Hi all,
I've had some trouble setting up Heartbeat V2 on a x86_64 Fedora Core 5 system.
I've
searched the mailing lists and linux-ha site but haven't been able to find a
solution
to my problem.
The problem I'm having is when both nodes are active, and I try shutting down
either
to test failov
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 06:45:48PM -, Rodrigo Borges
> Pereira wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > My Xen RA wasn't working as it should, due to the fact that it's
> > Xen_Status() function expects output differently.
> >
> > I've found on the changelog for 2.1.1 that the status function was
> >
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 06:42:59PM -, Rodrigo Borges
> Pereira wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I just want to confirm this. From what i've learned so far,
> STONITH is
> > relevant only to avoid data corruption when using shared
> storage. So,
> > is STONITH relevant when i'm using a non
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Alan Robertson wrote:
> We are in the final weeks of testing for release 2.1.3 - which has been
> delayed to the week of Dec 19.
>
> Please help us test this upcoming new release!
>
> You can get a source tar ball for it from any of these links:
> http://hg.linux-ha.org/t
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:45:46AM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On Dec 12, 2007, at 7:41 AM, DAIKI MATSUDA wrote:
>
>> Hi, All.
>>
>> I recently make own RA and mentioned the odd behaviour for monitor. It
>> is that without writing
>>
>> > timeout="10s" start_delay="30s"
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 11:12:46AM +0700, watthanachai wrote:
> I use for ipvsadm to load balance service http(80) smtp(25) is working well
>
> but when I want to set load balance to use with pop(110) protocol.
>
> It's can not load balance .
Looks like a question for a different forum. Thi
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:49:01AM +0700, watthanachai wrote:
> Now I use HA + ipvs on debian 4.0 sir.
>
> this is structure == >
>
> Master (10.x.x.149) lb0
> Slave (10.x.x.146) lb2
>
> I use ipvs style NAT mode.
>
> and use serial port config in ha.cf like this
>
> ha.cf on lb0
>
> d
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 07:13:31PM -0700, Jenkins, Benjamin (Ben) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using a virtual IP address with heartbeat over an RS232 cable to
> provide HA for my application today. I've now been asked to support a
> wider range of disaster recovery scenarios.
>
> I'm really hoping
Hello,
Since about a month ago an important IPC layer issue fixed. So
far it runs fine on the ethernet media, but hasn't be tested on
the serial connection. Any volunteers to test this with the
latest dev? If you don't have the latest dev it is available
(thanks to Lars and the OBS) here:
http://
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 06:45:48PM -, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My Xen RA wasn't working as it should, due to the fact that it's
> Xen_Status() function expects output differently.
>
> I've found on the changelog for 2.1.1 that the status function was updated
> for newer
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 06:42:59PM -, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just want to confirm this. From what i've learned so far, STONITH is
> relevant only to avoid data corruption when using shared storage. So, is
> STONITH relevant when i'm using a non-shared setup with Hear
Am 12.12.2007 um 03:59 schrieb Simon Horman:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 11:41:58AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:05:24 +0900
Von: Simon Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: General Linux-HA mailing list
Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] ldirect
>> If the error occurs on the resource, then resouce-failure-stickiness
>> will come to play and make your scores:
>> Node1: 10 - 10 = 0
>> Node2: 9
>> As 9 > 0, the resource will be started on Node2, and 22 stickiness will
>> be added. So you have 31 > 0.
>
> In your comments, you remarked a fai
17 matches
Mail list logo
