On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Jerome Yanga jya...@esri.com wrote:
Here is the scenario.
01) There are two nodes in the Active-Passive cluster--Nomen and Rubric.
02) Nomen had a hardware and software failure.
03) Rubric took over the resources as expected.
04) Due to the failures,
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Peter Kruse p...@q-leap.com wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Peter Kruse p...@q-leap.com wrote:
You are saying that it is okay that a single failure can bring the cluster
in a unsolvable situation? I thought SPoF
Ryan,
I'm doing the NAT out of the box at ASA5505 firewall so that rule i think is
not necessary.
David,
The ASA doing the nat only for the VIP.The real IP's of the boxes doesn't have
access to the outside world.
In the arp table of ASA i can see both ip's (real/virtual) with the same mac
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Any switch that shares power with the host(s) it controls clearly has a SPoF.
You don't need me to tell you that.
But that does not have to be a SPoF for the entire system! The problem here
is that a single failure (power loss) causes not only one node to
go
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Peter Kruse p...@q-leap.com wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Any switch that shares power with the host(s) it controls clearly has a SPoF.
You don't need me to tell you that.
But that does not have to be a SPoF for the entire system!
By default, yes
Hi,
I know there was an document on linux-ha.org but I just can't find it
anymore.
It showed what the exit codes should be and how to run scripts from the
shell and print out their exit status to make them heartbeat compliant.
Does anyone have a working link for this site please? I really
Am Montag, 11. Mai 2009 14:01:38 schrieb Tobias Appel:
Hi,
I know there was an document on linux-ha.org but I just can't find it
anymore.
It showed what the exit codes should be and how to run scripts from the
shell and print out their exit status to make them heartbeat compliant.
Does
Thanks - that was exactly the website I was looking for. Going to save
it now right away :)
Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
http://www.linux-ha.org/LSBResourceAgent
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
But that does not have to be a SPoF for the entire system! The problem here
is that a single failure (power loss) causes not only one node to
go down (and the pdu itself, yes), but the whole system stops working
properly. Now you now have to say that one has to equip the pdus with
I am trying to install Oracle 11g on Linux HA but there is no document to guide
us in Linux cluster configurations.
Please if you can give a link to this i will appreciate it.
Thanks
Femi
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
Hi,
i do have the same setup, SLES 11 with the HASI extension.
I'm also not able to get drbd running correctly with pacemaker.
I followed the DRBD Howto on the pacemaker homepage step by step,
the resources start correctly and when i deactivate one node within the hb_gui
all resources migrate
Dear Linux-HA list,
I would like to clarify some doubts I'm having preparing a possible
openldap OCF RA. I prepared the OCF RA using as reference the mysql
resource agent already existent in the Linux-HA scripts.
I already had some scripts to ldapsearch the database for integrity
purposes
Ciao,
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 02:36:48PM +0200, Cristina Bulfon wrote:
Ciao,
in attachment my cib.xml where I've already have a group and location
constraint with score=100.
If I understood correctly, the score is related to all resources so if I
don't have one of them
the score is less
Woo-hoo I can finally give an answer on this list! :)
You need to set the no-quorum-policy to ignore:
# crm configure property no-quorum-policy=ignore
Mine is now running very nice indeed. The DRBD-pacemaker1.0 howto is superb and
if you follow it and understand it then you should be fine.
I'm getting the following in my logs:
[49294.905016] drbd1: PingAck did not arrive in time.
[49294.905027] drbd1: peer( Secondary - Unknown ) conn( Connected -
NetworkFailure ) pdsk( UpToDate - DUnknown )
[49294.905041] drbd1: asender terminated
[49294.905044] drbd1: Terminating asender
I've seen a few mentions of testing STONITH but I can't find any
reference at the moment. I want to simulate a situation where one of my
two nodes will want to fence the other. Is there any way to do this? I'm
using the SSH STONITH plugin for testing and will likely use RSA / ILO
for production
16 matches
Mail list logo
