[Linux-HA] About OCF RA exportfs

2011-08-04 Thread alain . moulle
Hi, I checked all threads about HA NFS active/active, and I understood that the solution was to have a periodic backup of rmtab in a .rmtab locally in the shared FS, as it was effectively done in the OCF RA exportfs delivered in resource-agents-3.0.12-15 I just wonder if it is always the good

Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Re: [ha-wg-technical] The mess with OCF_CHECK_LEVEL ("crm" aborts during "commit")

2011-08-04 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 08:23:43AM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: > >>> Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 04.08.2011 um 18:32 in > >>> Nachricht > <20110804163245.GA28585@rondo.homenet>: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 05:45:16PM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > Some RAs sup

Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Re: location and orders : Question about a behavior ...

2011-08-04 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Maloja01 schrieb am 04.08.2011 um 18:49 in Nachricht <4e3acd86.1020...@arcor.de>: > Hi Ulrich, > > I did not folow the complete thread, just jumped in - sorry. Is the > resource inside a resource group? In this case the stickiness is > multiplied. And sofor the stickiness could be greater tha

[Linux-HA] Antw: Re: [ha-wg-technical] The mess with OCF_CHECK_LEVEL ("crm" aborts during "commit")

2011-08-04 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 04.08.2011 um 18:32 in >>> Nachricht <20110804163245.GA28585@rondo.homenet>: > Hi, > > On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 05:45:16PM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Some RAs support OCF_CHECK_LEVEL (e.g. ocf:heartbeat:Raid1). However the > OCF_CHECK_LEVEL is no

Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat Restart is not same as Stop and Start

2011-08-04 Thread Rahul Kanna
Mike, I checked the permission and those are fine. If you can please check the restart script I have given below, it does not touch the heartbeat lock file *touch $LOCKDIR/$SUBSYS* when the heartbeat is restared and I guess it is a problem. Is it not? Btw, we have a product for some web applic

Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Re: location and orders : Question about a behavior ...

2011-08-04 Thread Maloja01
Hi Ulrich, I did not folow the complete thread, just jumped in - sorry. Is the resource inside a resource group? In this case the stickiness is multiplied. And sofor the stickiness could be greater than the location role (score). Regards Fabian On 08/04/2011 03:10 PM, Ulrich Windl wrote: Ma

Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Re: location and orders : Question about a behavior ...

2011-08-04 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Maloja01 schrieb am 04.08.2011 um 12:58 in Nachricht <4e3a7b5c.1030...@arcor.de>: > On 08/04/2011 08:28 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Isn't the stickyness effectively based on the failcount? We have one > resource > > that has a location constraint for one node with a weight of 500

[Linux-HA] DMC 0.9.7 - Pacemaker/Storage GUI

2011-08-04 Thread Rasto Levrinc
Hi, This is the next DMC release 0.9.7. DMC is Pacemaker, Cluster Virtual Manager and Storage/DRBD GUI written in Java. The LVM plugins are now normal part of the GUI in the "Storage" view, where you can create, delete physical volumes, volume groups, logical volumes, resize them and create snaps

Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Re: location and orders : Question about a behavior ...

2011-08-04 Thread alain . moulle
Hi, and so ... about my initial question about automatic failback that was not expected for me with regards similar configuration on some other cluster of mine ? Thanks Alain De :Maloja01 A : linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org Date : 04/08/2011 12:58 Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Re: locati

Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Re: location and orders : Question about a behavior ...

2011-08-04 Thread Maloja01
On 08/04/2011 08:28 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote: > Hi! > > Isn't the stickyness effectively based on the failcount? We have one resource > that has a location constraint for one node with a weight of 50 and a > sticky ness of 10. The resource runs on a different node and shows no > tendency of