Hi Hideo-san,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:43:00PM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi Dejan,
Thank you for comments.
Hi Hideo-san,
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 09:18:07AM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi Dejan,
Thank you for comments.
I change
Hi Dejan,
Thank you for comments.
That's not a good reason. Testing if binaries exist on every
monitor operation really doesn't make much sense. Why would you
expect programs to start disappearing? And if they do, we may
have a much more serious problem to deal with.
All right.
We withdraw
Hi Dejan
This patch doesn't look right. What if the first kill(1) fails
(because, say, the process just exited)? And if '$result' is -ne
0, then the while loop will finish anyway.
I surely feel good by the normal end when a process does not exist.
So I withdraw my patch.
Regards,
Tomo
On
Ciao,
We have a RH Cluster Suite to manage virtual machines with CLVM.
A single virtual machine is on a logical volume and all machines that
belong to
a cluster can see it.
I am wondering if is it possible to have the same with pacemaker ?
If yes what kind of software do I have to use it other
On 4/10/12 11:43 AM, Cristina Bulfon wrote:
We have a RH Cluster Suite to manage virtual machines with CLVM.
A single virtual machine is on a logical volume and all machines that
belong to
a cluster can see it.
I am wondering if is it possible to have the same with pacemaker ?
If yes what
It looks like the drbd RA is calling crm_master during the monitor action.
That wouldn't seem like a good idea as the value isn't counted until
the resource is started and if the transition is interrupted (as it is
here) then the PE won't try to promote it (because the value didn't
change).
Has
