Re: [Linux-HA] errors during make install process of heartbeat 2.0.8

2007-03-23 Thread David Lee
y. 2. Editing of '/etc/passwd' and 'useradd'-like operations are not done by 'make install', and rightly so. 3. Editing of (etc.) is done by package-maintenance procedures, and heartbeat supports this for Debian, RPM, pkg. (And BSD also, I think.) 4. Fo

Re: [Linux-HA] errors during make install process of heartbeat 2.0.8

2007-03-23 Thread David Lee
of the hacluster and haclient user/group. Now in place on the development version. If you are really keen, see: http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev/ The two changes I made are: http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev/rev/3f4236a16927 http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev/rev/f4c534d86e55 Hope that is OK! -- :

Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat compatibility question

2007-04-05 Thread David Lee
of platforms. I think I can > recall somebody having a solaris/linux cluster. (Drifting off-topic a little...) To confirm: I have run a 1.2.x Solaris/Linux pair in the past. Never really pushed it hard, and only used it for simple IPaddr failover, but it worked that

Re: [Linux-HA] standalone pingd.sh

2007-04-19 Thread David Lee
d probably be in one of the heartbeat runtime locations rather than /tmp. If someone can identify the best location, then the autoconfiscation of your code at the appropriate time will be able to handle this. Sorry for that list! Please don't take it too nega

Re: [Linux-HA] standalone pingd.sh

2007-04-20 Thread David Lee
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Xinwei Hu wrote: > [David Lee had earlier written:] > > > > 5. "ping -q -c 1 $ping_host". The options for "ping" are notoriously > > variable from system to system. Keep it simple. (For example my system > > doesn't have

Re: [Linux-HA] standalone pingd.sh

2007-04-23 Thread David Lee
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Alan Robertson wrote: > David Lee wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Xinwei Hu wrote: > > > >> [David Lee had earlier written:] > >>> 5. "ping -q -c 1 $ping_host". The options for "ping" are notoriously > >>&

Re: [Linux-HA] ipfail not failing over when ping nodes are unpingable

2007-04-24 Thread David Lee
ubnets (as in simple routing) where using the same MAC isn't a problem. (Concepts of "ethernet bonding", "link aggregation" (etc.) of multiple interfaces are relatively new and would require a little extra configuration to achieve on default Sun hardware.) Hope that helps.

Re: [Linux-HA] standalone pingd.sh

2007-04-30 Thread David Lee
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Alan Robertson wrote: > David Lee wrote: > > > > The principle of calling the system "ping" is clean and simple -- far more > > so (isn't it?) than having to (re-)write a ping-like command to call the C > > code in our base. >

Re: [Linux-HA] standalone pingd.sh

2007-05-03 Thread David Lee
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, David Lee wrote: > [...] > We already have such code, and already have it duplicated (ouch!) in > "resources/OCF/IPaddr.in" and "resources/heartbeat/IPaddr.in". And > "pingd.sh" is in danger of making this triplicate. > [...]

Re: [Linux-HA] Compilation of 2.0.8 failure.

2007-05-04 Thread David Lee
rsion instead. The basic underlying idea is to make best efforts for a build-from-source to work if at all possible. Failure to build should (in theory) only happen if some sort of "essential" pre-requisite is absent. Absence of a non-essential should (in theor

Re: [Linux-HA] Problem installing heartbeat on Solaris 10

2007-05-04 Thread David Lee
ather than 2.0.8, in case there have been any bugfixes in this area since 2.0.8? http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev/archive/tip.tar.gz If you wish, send me _off-list_ the entire output of the "configure" stage, and I could try (alas with no promises) to take a look. (Ideally from that &quo

Re: [Linux-HA] standalone pingd.sh

2007-05-04 Thread David Lee
On Thu, 3 May 2007, Alan Robertson wrote: > David Lee wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, David Lee wrote: > > > >> [...] > >> We already have such code, and already have it duplicated (ouch!) in > >> "resources/OCF/IPaddr.in" and "resources/h

Re: [Linux-HA] ld error while running ConfigureMe make

2007-05-22 Thread David Lee
ommend using heartbeat's "ConfigureMe", rather than directly using "configure". Could you check the output of your "ConfigureMe" run (its "configure" component) to see it discovered about "gnutls" and "quorumd", and how they may

Re: [Linux-HA] ld error while running ConfigureMe make

2007-05-24 Thread David Lee
igureMe" run (its "configure" > >component) to see it discovered about "gnutls" and "quorumd", and how they > >may relate to any options passed from "ConfigureMe" to "configure"? > >Thanks. It would still be useful,

Re: [Linux-HA] issue with management of heartbeat.pid file

2007-05-24 Thread David Lee
"/proc", the pid-like entries seem to be directories. On one of them it is "dr-xr-xr-x", on another it is "dr-x--x--x". On the basis of that, would "test -d" be better? Also, the update has "echo ..." to print configure's output. The official

Re: [Linux-HA] heartbeat 2.0 on Solaris 10

2007-05-31 Thread David Lee
vant extracts from configure/build output logs, runtime logfiles, etc., then people here may be able to offer advice. And if those issues seem to reveal underlying bugs or documentation holes, we'll try to use that evidence to fix them. Hope that helps. -- : David Lee

Re: Solved! Re: [Linux-HA] Tieing DRBD into heartbeat

2007-06-27 Thread David Lee
annot second guess its location (Linux: /sbin Solaris: /usr/sbin). How does that seem? (In the original poster's problem, if "fsck" was present, then configure should have found it (or there was something flawed with his build process which needs addressing). If it was absent, th

Re: [Linux-HA] SIOCSIFFLAGS: Cannot assign requested address

2007-07-05 Thread David Lee
-2.x series. The official release is 2.0.8, but I understand that a 2.1.0 is also available and preferred by some people. Summary: Use a current OS and a current heartbeat release. Hope that helps. -- : David LeeI.T. Service : : Senior Systems

Re: [Linux-HA] Problems on Solaris 10

2007-07-16 Thread David Lee
en in the development tree for some weeks. But I was not easily able to test the other; that part of bug remains open. Coincidentally, just this weekend Alan has also visited this area because of an issue with the fix, which we are now addressing. Could I suggest that we look at bug 1576, pleas

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Re: [Linux-HA] Release testing with CTS

2007-07-16 Thread David Lee
about building, rather than running. But it does (if I read it correctly) include the useful build-time "problem X caused by update Y" functionality. -- : David LeeI.T. Service : : Senior Systems Programmer

Re: [Linux-HA] Problems on Solaris 10

2007-07-16 Thread David Lee
with the build side of things.) -- : David LeeI.T. Service : : Senior Systems ProgrammerComputer Centre : : UNIX Team Leader Durham University : : South Road: :

Re: [Linux-HA] Failover affecting other services on HA hosts

2007-10-11 Thread David Lee
restart with the revised named.conf configuration (which would need to be maintained and available across both machines). When you get it working, it might be worth writing it up as an example for the heartbeat wiki or other documentation. Hope that

[Linux-HA] Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Call for testers: 2.1.3

2007-12-12 Thread David Lee
eam from the function's "stdin" (whose first-line, first-record becomes the "$1") and to use the proper awk-array [...] syntax. Unfortunately when I just tried that, my attempted '[...]' is getting zapped between "configure.in" and &quo

Re: [Linux-HA] Solaris 10 x86 Compile Fails

2008-02-05 Thread David Lee
atch any day now...please...) I guess that "telecom/recoverymgrd/conf_lex.l" contains a flex-ism; something that works in GNU/flex but not in manufacturer "lex". If you could investigate that, and try to provide a fix (that must, of course, continue to work in "flex&qu

Re: [Linux-HA] Solaris 10 x86 Compile Fails

2008-02-05 Thread David Lee
yjob). But I can at least try to reproduce them and try to narrow down towards the problem area. Best wishes. -- : David LeeI.T. Service : : Senior Systems ProgrammerComputer Centre : : UNIX Team Leader

Re: [Linux-HA] mysql OCF issue on CentOS 5.1 after upgrading to heartbeat 2.1.3-3

2008-02-12 Thread David Lee
, but...) (There's currently a parallel thread (with Subject typo of "CentoOS") running about this; I'm also in contact with the CentOS packager.) -- : David LeeI.T. Service : : Senior Systems ProgrammerComp

[Linux-HA] CentoOS RPMs: uid? gid?

2008-02-12 Thread David Lee
rs for their uid/gid? -- : David LeeI.T. Service : : Senior Systems ProgrammerComputer Centre : : UNIX Team Leader Durham University : : South Road

Re: [Linux-HA] Compiling Heartbeat on Solaris10

2008-02-14 Thread David Lee
en many improvements between those times, including in the build procedures for non-Linux systems. If you have problems, whether compile-time or run-time, then report the details of such problems back here. Hope that helps. -- : David LeeI.T. Service :

Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat on Solaris 10

2008-02-25 Thread David Lee
ce". Can someone briefly describe what that declaration is wishing to achieve? Then we can set about understanding it and seeing if it can be made more reliable. Hope that helps. -- : David LeeI.T. Service : : Senior Systems ProgrammerCompute

Re: Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat on Solaris 10

2008-02-26 Thread David Lee
aris 10 is an impressive OS, more people should try it. Actually I tend to stay with S8 and S9. S10 made so many changes to system boot procedures, and we're locally migrating away from Solaris towards Linux, that the migration to S10 here seemed a poor choice. (But I do run a bit of S10 on a c

Re: Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat on Solaris 10

2008-02-26 Thread David Lee
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:48:14PM +0000, David Lee wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the quick responses Dave and Dejan. Dejans suggested fix for > > > the structure wo

Re: [Linux-HA] heartbeat on solaris 10 (problems)

2008-03-13 Thread David Lee
1 to 2). The rebuild should then work. (I hope!) To understand what it does, look near line 50 where it is used to pick up which form of the "reboot(...)" call to use. Hope that helps. -- : David LeeI.T. Service :

Re: [Linux-HA] Bugfix release for Heartbeat in old packaging

2008-03-13 Thread David Lee
uot;lib/clplumbing/cl_reboot.c" source file. This has since been properly fixed in Hg about three weeks ago (Tue Feb 19). (There have been at least two reports on this list about that, the latest just earlier today: "heartbeat on solaris 10 (problems)".) Thanks. -- :

Re: [Linux-HA] HA on Solaris 9 ?

2008-04-15 Thread David Lee
ad trouble with the 'grandchild' (Solaris) model. Something like that... I suspect a lurking bug there. If I get time in the next few days I'll see whether I can refresh my memory of it. (I seem to recall that we discussed it on the "linux-ha-dev" list.) Meanwhile, if

RE: [Linux-HA] HA on Solaris 9 ?

2008-04-15 Thread David Lee
find something, Great! Welcome aboard! Problem analysis would be welcome. If you can supplement that with suggested solutions or even bugfixes that would be welcome, but don't spend disproportionate time on dreaming up actual bugfixes as they can often require other considerati

RE: [Linux-HA] HA on Solaris 9 ?

2008-04-22 Thread David Lee
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, David Lee wrote: > On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Jan Chaloupecky wrote: > > [...] > > Yes, I read your following email exange in the mailing list archive: > > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/users/40766?search_string=%2Bheartbeat%20%2Bk%20%2BSolar

Re: [Linux-HA] gmake[2]: *** [ccmlib_memapi.lo] Error 1 - solaris 10 sparc

2008-05-21 Thread David Lee
eartbeat (and pacemaker) packages themselves built and distributed in CSW/blastwave itself. But don't hold your breath waiting for that one...) -- : David LeeI.T. Service : : Senior Systems Programmer

Re: [Linux-HA] error code 139

2008-05-21 Thread David Lee
he list) know your findings (including your package version, where your package came from etc.). (The packaging can, in principle, ensure that all dependencies are fulfilled. But the actual practice (by the packager) of doing this can sometimes accidentally miss a dependency.) Hope that helps

Re: [Linux-HA] gmake[2]: *** [ccmlib_memapi.lo] Error 1 - solaris 10 sparc

2008-05-30 Thread David Lee
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Jan Chaloupecky wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 12:53 PM, David Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [...] > > My suggestion would be to try to use 'csw' for everything, including the > > 'gcc' compiler. > > > &g

Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat & Pacemaker versions

2008-09-05 Thread David Lee
eferentially reporting to "linux-ha-dev" rather than "linux-ha"). -- : David LeeI.T. Service : : Senior Systems ProgrammerComputer Centre : : UNIX Team Leader Durham University : :

Re: [Linux-HA] nodes on different subnets

2008-11-05 Thread David Lee
if a particular instance failed, the routing would simply find another instance of that same IP address. (Or, again, something like that.) -- : David LeeI.T. Service : : Senior Systems ProgrammerComputer Centre : : UNIX Tea

Re: AW: AW: AW: [Linux-HA] Linux-HA: E-Mail Notification Problemby takeover

2008-11-12 Thread David Lee
ConfigureMe (configure)" output for stuff to do with the mail program. And check any Makefile to see its value of "MAILCMD": this ought to be a real pathname, but I suspect might be empty in your case. Hope that helps. -- : Davi

Re: [Linux-HA] nodes on different subnets

2008-11-12 Thread David Lee
any real meaning) because anycast is purely a network routing feature which, from heartbeat's persepctive (as an application sitting on the network) would be "unicast". Hope that helps. -- : David LeeI.T. Service : : Senior Systems Pr

Re: [Linux-HA] Linux-HA on solaris

2009-01-26 Thread David Lee
c/ I've no idea whether there is any compatibility overlap between pacemaker and OHAC. I suspect, sadly, that there might not be (i.e. that the clustering world has split into two (or more) parts). Hope that helps a little (even though it is not the simple, bright "yes" you might ha

Re: [Linux-HA] Linux-HA on solaris

2009-01-27 Thread David Lee
Hi, Andrew. Thanks for the reply. Hope you are well. On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 18:11, David Lee wrote: [...] My guess (but it is just a guess) is that pacemaker probably no longer builds on non-Linux machines. Can anyone confirm/refute this