Re: [Linux-HA] Error compiling pacemaker gui on Centos 6

2012-09-06 Thread Gao,Yan
dependencies problem??? Weird. Haven't met any problem to build it against pacemaker-1.1.7. > Anyone has succesfully installed gui on centos 6? I guess you have installed the corresponding pacemaker-libs-devel, right? If so, can you please try the attached patch? Regards, Gao,Yan -- Ga

Re: [Linux-HA] Error compiling pacemaker gui on Centos 6

2012-09-06 Thread Gao,Yan
]: *** [libhbmgmt_la-mgmt_lib.lo] Error 1 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory > `/tmp/hb/Pacemaker-Python-GUI-efff2a4588e5/mgmt/daemon' > gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/hb/Pacemaker-Python-GUI-efff2a4588e5/mgmt' > gmake: *** [all-recursive] Err

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

2012-01-10 Thread Gao,Yan
to a repository of Andrew, I hope for release > of pygui2.0.1. > * We are going to release it in a site of Japan. Hideo, all latest commits in "master" and "2.0" branch with "2.0.1" tag have been pushed. Regards, Gaoyan -- Gao,Yan Software Engineer

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

2011-12-05 Thread Gao,Yan
Hi Andrew, On 11/30/11 19:01, Gao,Yan wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On 11/28/11 07:53, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Gao,Yan wrote: >>> Hi Hideo, >>> >>> On 11/24/11 15:48, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: >>>>

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

2011-12-05 Thread Gao,Yan
Hi Hideo, On 12/02/11 14:38, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > Hi Yan, > Hi Andrew, > > I confirmed movement in combination with Pacemaker1.0.12 in a repository of > your test. > * https://github.com/gao-yan/pacemaker-mgmt/commits/2.0-test > > > On my test, both

Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Re: Q: "cib-last-written"

2011-12-01 Thread Gao,Yan
On 12/01/11 16:10, Ulrich Windl wrote: >>>> "Gao,Yan" schrieb am 01.12.2011 um 06:55 in Nachricht > <4ed716be.9090...@suse.com>: >> Hi, >> >> On 11/30/11 21:35, Ulrich Windl wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> Simple question:

Re: [Linux-HA] Q: "cib-last-written"

2011-11-30 Thread Gao,Yan
but the "cib-last-written" > is "Thu Sep 29 08:24:01 2011" > > Regards, > Ulrich > > > ___ > Linux-HA mailing list > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha &g

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

2011-11-30 Thread Gao,Yan
Hi Andrew, On 11/28/11 07:53, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Gao,Yan wrote: >> Hi Hideo, >> >> On 11/24/11 15:48, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: >>> Hi Yan, >>> >>> About this matter, were you selected? >>>

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

2011-11-30 Thread Gao,Yan
terlabs.org/pacemaker/pygui/rev/c08b84a8203f > > Because we want latest GUI for Pacemaker1.0. I pushed a new branch "2.0-test" which is supposed to be compatible with pacemaker-1.0.x: https://github.com/gao-yan/pacemaker-mgmt/commits/2.0-test Could you please build and test

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

2011-11-24 Thread Gao,Yan
Hi Hideo, On 11/24/11 15:48, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > Hi Yan, > > About this matter, were you selected? > > Best Regards, > Hideo Yamauchi. > > --- On Wed, 2011/9/21, Gao,Yan wrote: > >> >> On 09/19/11 12:19, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:

Re: [Linux-HA] Q: Utilization and resource groups

2011-10-12 Thread Gao,Yan
't it find out that the capacity on one > node is insufficient to start all the resources in one group? Instead of > starting to fire up a dead end, why not migrating the resource group to > another node? > > Is it a bug in the policy engine or LRM? >

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

2011-09-20 Thread Gao,Yan
I'll convert it and decide where to host it. Regards, Gaoyan -- Gao,Yan Software Engineer China Server Team, SUSE. ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

2011-08-21 Thread Gao,Yan
or pacemaker-mgmt-2.0 which would be keeping compatible with pacemaker-1.0 BTW, pacemaker-1.1 has been merged with devel repo. The tip of pacemaker-mgmt can be built against pacemaker-1.1 now. Regards, Gaoyan -- Gao,Yan Software Engineer China Server Team, SUSE. ___

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

2011-08-03 Thread Gao,Yan
bly tag a new version in the near future. Regards, Gao,Yan -- Gao,Yan Software Engineer China Server Team, SUSE. ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

2011-07-28 Thread Gao,Yan
possibly improves/integrates it >> with the pacemaker side of things. > > We do not think about the correction of Heartbeat, too for the moment. > We think that only the correction of Pacemaker-mgmt is enough. That attached patch places it at the end of the loop. I think it shoul

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

2011-07-27 Thread Gao,Yan
> snmp_read(&fdset); > > ret = handle_heartbeat_msg(); > read > queueing msg.!! > } > (snip) I'm still confused about invoking handle_heartbreat_msg() when select() finds that t

Re: [Linux-HA] mgmtd: [xxx]: ERROR: on_listen attach server socket failed

2011-06-15 Thread Gao,Yan
epting a connection request from the client, mgmtd will need to create a gnutls session on the socket for communication. While it seems to have failed for you. You need to confirm the mgmtd was compiled against the corresponding gnutls. Regards, Yan -- Gao,Yan

Re: [Linux-HA] mgmtd: [1122]: ERROR: on_listen protocol mismatch. Want 2.1 but got 1.0

2011-06-10 Thread Gao,Yan
hat is wrong? > > I'm guessing you need a newer version of the GUI on your client, i.e. > one that matches the version of heartbeat-gui or pacemaker-mgmt, or > whatever is installed on your cluster node(s). Indeed. On the client machine, you could only install the pacemaker-mgmt-client.