On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> On 9/18/2011 7:22 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Dimitri Maziuk
>> wrote:
> ...
>> No it means one of more filesystem_drbd and primitive_nfslock
>> operations failed really badly on node1.
>> Possibly it was
On 9/18/2011 7:22 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
...
> No it means one of more filesystem_drbd and primitive_nfslock
> operations failed really badly on node1.
> Possibly it was the initial health check (to check it wasn't already
> running befor
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
>
> WTH does this mean (from node2):
>
> pengine: [16069]: notice: clone_print: Master/Slave Set: master_drbd
> pengine: [16069]: notice: short_print: Masters: [ node1 ]
> pengine: [16069]: notice: short_print: Slaves: [ node2 ]
> p
WTH does this mean (from node2):
pengine: [16069]: notice: clone_print: Master/Slave Set: master_drbd
pengine: [16069]: notice: short_print: Masters: [ node1 ]
pengine: [16069]: notice: short_print: Slaves: [ node2 ]
pengine: [16069]: notice: native_print:
filesystem_drbd#011(ocf::hear
