Re: [Linux-HA] How do I clear the Failed actions section?

2012-03-08 Thread Helmut Wollmersdorfer
Am 08.03.2012 um 13:33 schrieb William Seligman: > On 3/8/12 6:53 AM, Helmut Wollmersdorfer wrote: >> >> [...] >> Master/Slave Set: DrbdClone2 >> Resource Group: group_drbd2:0 >> xen_drbd2_1:0 (ocf::linbit:drbd): Slave xen10 (unmanaged) >> FAILED >> xen_drbd2

Re: [Linux-HA] How do I clear the Failed actions section?

2012-03-08 Thread William Seligman
On 3/8/12 6:53 AM, Helmut Wollmersdorfer wrote: Am 07.03.2012 um 18:01 schrieb Florian Haas: On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 5:51 PM, William Seligman wrote: Again, a disclaimer: I am not an expert. Your advice was spot on. :) But what to do, if cleanup is not working? And everything is running:

Re: [Linux-HA] How do I clear the Failed actions section?

2012-03-08 Thread Helmut Wollmersdorfer
Am 07.03.2012 um 18:01 schrieb Florian Haas: > On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 5:51 PM, William Seligman > wrote: >> Again, a disclaimer: I am not an expert. > > Your advice was spot on. :) But what to do, if cleanup is not working? And everything is running: # crm status Last updated: Thu

Re: [Linux-HA] How do I clear the Failed actions section?

2012-03-07 Thread Florian Haas
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 5:51 PM, William Seligman wrote: > Again, a disclaimer: I am not an expert. Your advice was spot on. :) Cheers, Florian -- Need help with High Availability? http://www.hastexo.com/now ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.li

Re: [Linux-HA] How do I clear the Failed actions section?

2012-03-07 Thread William Seligman
On 3/7/12 10:50 AM, Jerome Yanga wrote: > I would just want to share that the command recommended did NOT move > the resource to another node. It basically clears the Failed Actions > section. This is why I was conditional in my response. Suppose you had something like the following: primitive M

Re: [Linux-HA] How do I clear the Failed actions section?

2012-03-07 Thread Jerome Yanga
I would just want to share that the command recommended did NOT move the resource to another node. It basically clears the Failed Actions section. Thanks again, Bill. Regards, j On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 11:46 AM, William Seligman wrote: > On 3/6/12 2:38 PM, Jerome Yanga wrote: > >> Do you know b

Re: [Linux-HA] How do I clear the Failed actions section?

2012-03-06 Thread Jerome Yanga
Understood. Thanks again, Bill. Regards, j On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 11:46 AM, William Seligman wrote: > On 3/6/12 2:38 PM, Jerome Yanga wrote: > >> Do you know by chance if that command you have provided bounces the resource? > > I don't know what you mean by "bounce the resource." According to:

Re: [Linux-HA] How do I clear the Failed actions section?

2012-03-06 Thread William Seligman
On 3/6/12 2:38 PM, Jerome Yanga wrote: > Do you know by chance if that command you have provided bounces the resource? I don't know what you mean by "bounce the resource." According to: the command refreshes the resource status. Depending on your co

Re: [Linux-HA] How do I clear the Failed actions section?

2012-03-06 Thread Jerome Yanga
Thanks, Bill. Do you know by chance if that command you have provided bounces the resource? Regards, j On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:28 AM, William Seligman wrote: > On 3/6/12 1:04 PM, Jerome Yanga wrote: >> crm_mon shows the error below. >> >> Failed actions: >>     drbd0:1_monitor_59000 (node=tes

Re: [Linux-HA] How do I clear the Failed actions section?

2012-03-06 Thread William Seligman
On 3/6/12 1:04 PM, Jerome Yanga wrote: > crm_mon shows the error below. > > Failed actions: > drbd0:1_monitor_59000 (node=testserver1.example.com, call=132, > rc=-2, status=Timed Out): unknown exec error > > I have check DRBD and the mirror is connected and uptodate on both nodes. > > The er

[Linux-HA] How do I clear the Failed actions section?

2012-03-06 Thread Jerome Yanga
crm_mon shows the error below. Failed actions: drbd0:1_monitor_59000 (node=testserver1.example.com, call=132, rc=-2, status=Timed Out): unknown exec error I have check DRBD and the mirror is connected and uptodate on both nodes. The error above caused the resources to failover and it seems t