Re: [Linux-HA] SegFault with two symmetrical colocations

2009-05-26 Thread Steinhauer Juergen
Hi! I hope that's what you meant with stack trace: (gdb) bt #0 0x00a3f70b in pe_find_node_id (nodes=0x82cad00, id=0x82c7418 "04057199-76a0-4fe6-8963-c3fe931b0dfe") at status.c:294 #1 0x00a656bd in node_list_update (list1=0x82c25b0, list2=0x82cad00, factor=1) at native.c:704 #2 0x00a

Re: [Linux-HA] SegFault with two symmetrical colocations

2009-05-20 Thread Steinhauer Juergen
Andrew Beekhof schrieb: > same way you got the stack trace. > except instead of typing "bt", type: > print lpc > print *node > (gdb) print lpc $1 = 0 (gdb) print *node $2 = {weight = 137125184, fixed = 0, count = 0, details = 0x0} Should I open a bug ticket somewhere? > Basically the version

Re: [Linux-HA] SegFault with two symmetrical colocations

2009-05-20 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Steinhauer Juergen wrote: > Andrew Beekhof schrieb: >> yep. >> thats a very strange place to crash. >> can you try printing the values of lpc and *node please? > > Sorry, no idea how to do that same way you got the stack trace. except instead of typing "bt", t

Re: [Linux-HA] SegFault with two symmetrical colocations

2009-05-19 Thread Steinhauer Juergen
Andrew Beekhof schrieb: > yep. > thats a very strange place to crash. > can you try printing the values of lpc and *node please? Sorry, no idea how to do that > but generally speaking, the config doesn't make sense. > symmetrical was a short-term hack that wont do what you think it will. > >

Re: [Linux-HA] SegFault with two symmetrical colocations

2009-05-19 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Steinhauer Juergen wrote: > Hi! > > I hope that's what you meant with stack trace: yep. thats a very strange place to crash. can you try printing the values of lpc and *node please? but generally speaking, the config doesn't make sense. symmetrical was a short-te

Re: [Linux-HA] SegFault with two symmetrical colocations

2009-05-19 Thread Steinhauer Juergen
Hi! I hope that's what you meant with stack trace: (gdb) bt #0 0x00a3f70b in pe_find_node_id (nodes=0x82cad00, id=0x82c7418 "04057199-76a0-4fe6-8963-c3fe931b0dfe") at status.c:294 #1 0x00a656bd in node_list_update (list1=0x82c25b0, list2=0x82cad00, factor=1) at native.c:704 #2 0x00a6

Re: [Linux-HA] SegFault with two symmetrical colocations

2009-05-19 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Steinhauer Juergen wrote: > Hi guys! > > I'm running heartbeat 2.1.3 with pacemaker 0.6. > I have a resource "ip" and two resources "app1, app2", depending on "ip". > I want to achieve, that switching "app1" or "app2" to the other node, > also moves the "ip" and th

[Linux-HA] SegFault with two symmetrical colocations

2009-05-19 Thread Steinhauer Juergen
Hi guys! I'm running heartbeat 2.1.3 with pacemaker 0.6. I have a resource "ip" and two resources "app1, app2", depending on "ip". I want to achieve, that switching "app1" or "app2" to the other node, also moves the "ip" and the other app to this node. As soon as I configure two colocations like