Robert Wipfel a e'crit:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 9:51 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 12:37:37PM +0200, FG wrote:
Hi all,
[...]
Yes, you should use STONITH.
Or perhaps somebody knows
Hi all,
I need some advices about my configuration for high-availability.
I would like to set up an active/passive configuration for our POP/IMAP
server.
We have two servers with each one two HBA cards (FC) attached to a SAN
IBM DS4000 where we store the mailbox.
My concern:
In case of a fa
Robert Wipfel a écrit :
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 9:51 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 12:37:37PM +0200, FG wrote:
Hi all,
[...]
Yes, you should use STONITH.
Or perhaps somebody knows
>>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 9:51 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 12:37:37PM +0200, FG wrote:
>> Hi all,
[...]
> Yes, you should use STONITH.
>
>> Or perhaps somebody knows that a SAN DS4000 can
>> give access to the
>
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 12:37:37PM +0200, FG wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I need some advices about my configuration for
> high-availability.
> I would like to set up an active/passive
> configuration for our POP/IMAP
> server.
>
> We have two servers with each one two HBA cards
> (FC) attached to a S
Hi all,
I need some advices about my configuration for
high-availability.
I would like to set up an active/passive
configuration for our POP/IMAP
server.
We have two servers with each one two HBA cards
(FC) attached to a SAN
IBM DS4000 where we store the mailbox.
My concern:
In case of a f