Re: [Linux-HA] beating a dead horse: cLVM, OCFS2 and TOTEM

2013-07-10 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2013-07-10T08:31:17, Ulrich Windl wrote: > I had reported about terrible performance of cLVM (maybe related to using > OCFS also) when uses in SLES11 SP2. I guesses cLVM (or OCFS2) is > "communicating to death" on activity. Now I have some interesing news: No, the performance issue with cLV

[Linux-HA] beating a dead horse: cLVM, OCFS2 and TOTEM

2013-07-09 Thread Ulrich Windl
Hi! I had reported about terrible performance of cLVM (maybe related to using OCFS also) when uses in SLES11 SP2. I guesses cLVM (or OCFS2) is "communicating to death" on activity. Now I have some interesing news: on top of cLVM/OCFS I have image files for Xen VMs. I set up an OpenLDAP server