Hi,
Tried to make pingd work. I had to change the pingd OCF RA a
bit (mostly typos), hence the patch.
Notes:
. The default PID file path points to a directory owned by
root. However, it looks like that by default the pingd
daemon should run as hacluster. Right?
. I changed the default
On 2006-06-10T11:04:33, linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org wrote:
linux-ha CVS committal
Author : alan
Host:
Module : linux-ha
Dir : linux-ha
Modified Files:
configure.in
Log Message:
Put in some code to detect missing directories, and also to drop a trailing
On 2006-06-09T13:01:32, linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org wrote:
linux-ha CVS committal
Author : alan
Host:
Project : linux-ha
Module : resources
Dir : linux-ha/resources/OCF
Modified Files:
IPaddr.in IPaddr2.in
Log Message:
Updated the name of netmask to
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-06-09T13:01:32, linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org wrote:
linux-ha CVS committal
Author : alan
Host:
Project : linux-ha
Module : resources
Dir : linux-ha/resources/OCF
Modified Files:
IPaddr.in IPaddr2.in
Log Message:
Updated the name of
On 2006-06-12T09:04:45, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No one reads the help text. They just get it wrong.
If you say so...
It was wrong from the beginning. It is not the only mistake, I'm
afraid... But, it's the only one that seems to cause customers problems.
I changed it
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-06-10T11:04:33, linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org wrote:
linux-ha CVS committal
Author : alan
Host:
Module : linux-ha
Dir : linux-ha
Modified Files:
configure.in
Log Message:
Put in some code to detect missing directories, and also to drop a
On 2006-06-08T16:13:49, Lars Marowsky-Bree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wanted to point out that this discussion hasn't reached a
conclusion yet. As this is qualified as a blocker in bugzilla, that
doesn't strike me as an adequate response...
On 2006-06-08T14:14:35, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-06-12T09:09:02, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This will ONLY happen if it has been incorrectly specified. So, I don't
see a reason to patch it out for anyone. It will only happen if someone
specifically specified --libdir=/usr/lib64 AND /usr/lib64
On 2006-06-12T13:05:51, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-06-08T16:13:49, Lars Marowsky-Bree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wanted to point out that this discussion hasn't reached a
conclusion yet. As this is qualified as a blocker in bugzilla, that
