[Linux-ha-dev] Release 2.1.1 entering final testing - looking for help

2007-07-13 Thread Alan Robertson
Hi, I would like to complete release 2.1.1 before next Monday (my time). I have selected what I hope is the final set of patches. If you can help us test, and send emails to the lists, CCing me, that would be great! Here are the source tar balls for the release:

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Should br/ tag be br?

2007-07-13 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 7/13/07, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 7/11/07, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 7/11/07, DAIKI MATSUDA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, all. I found a little bug in crm_mon source code (crm/admin/crm_mon.c). It

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Release 2.1.1 entering final testing - looking for help

2007-07-13 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2007-07-13T01:02:37, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Note that these are not being built nightly - at least not as of this writing :-(. At the moment it's the same as the /dev build, but that will change. If you do want a nightly build, just let me know. We've got the

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] ping vs. ping_group

2007-07-13 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2007-07-13T13:39:12, David Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've recently had a look inside ping.c and ping_group.c. It wasn't a great surprise to find some commonality. I guess one was derived from other. It means that we've got considerable code duplication, potential unnecessary

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] 2.1.1 is imminent

2007-07-13 Thread Max Hofer
On Friday 13 July 2007, Alan Robertson wrote: Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 7/12/07, Lars Marowsky-Bree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2007-07-12T12:26:35, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew has some more critical bugfixes pending / under development (one of them is a STONITH

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] 2.1.1 is imminent

2007-07-13 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2007-07-13T10:13:28, Max Hofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But what is it good for running regression tests (which i hope you guys do before releasing a new version) if you pull code from dev to test branch 3 days before the release should come out? Well, dev is being constantly tested

[Linux-ha-dev] More thoughts about 2.1.1 - SCHEDULE CHANGE - 23 July, 2007

2007-07-13 Thread Alan Robertson
Hi, I have a few things to say here, and a change of mind, which I'll explain in more detail. First, I appreciate the work that Andrew and Dejan and Dave and others have gone to to get us what looks like a really solid release. Awesome work guys! Second, I want to apologize for not fully

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] 2.1.1 is imminent

2007-07-13 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 7/13/07, Max Hofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 13 July 2007, Alan Robertson wrote: Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 7/12/07, Lars Marowsky-Bree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2007-07-12T12:26:35, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew has some more critical bugfixes pending /

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] ping vs. ping_group

2007-07-13 Thread Alan Robertson
David Lee wrote: I've recently had a look inside ping.c and ping_group.c. It wasn't a great surprise to find some commonality. I guess one was derived from other. It means that we've got considerable code duplication, potential unnecessary divergence and potential one-but-miss-the-other

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] ping vs. ping_group

2007-07-13 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2007-07-13T13:34:59, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here's the bugzilla for that capability: http://old.linux-foundation.org/developer_bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1497 This would greatly improve the situation for 2-node clusters and in most cases would eliminate the possibility of