Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Re: RFC: Roadmap for 2.2.0

2008-02-03 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2008-02-01T09:00:23, Tadashiro Yoshida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's true. There are no definite conventions and rules how each software > module should be divided. It depends on the product and project. > What I said is just my expectation for Heartbeat. So this means you'd be happy

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] RFC: Roadmap for 2.2.0

2008-02-03 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2008-01-29T10:31:35, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to propose the following changes to happen in the next > heartbeat release, which I'd name 2.2.0 because of them. ... If noone has any remaining objections, I suppose we could go ahead with this in the i

[Linux-ha-dev] Re: RFC: Roadmap for 2.2.0

2008-02-03 Thread Tadashiro Yoshida
At Sun, 3 Feb 2008 18:51:26 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 2008-02-01T09:00:23, Tadashiro Yoshida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The fact that we have non-SUSE packages for OpenAIS, Heartbeat and > > > Pacemaker on the build service should u