Re: [Linux-ha-dev] tools/ccdv

2008-03-04 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
Matthew Soffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 15:12 +0100, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > > > Hi, > > [snip] > > > Well, I made it work on OpenBSD i386, and I can say it runs on sparc and > > sparc64 too. I try to get my VAX Station up and running, to test it there >

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] tools/ccdv

2008-03-04 Thread Matthew Soffen
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 15:12 +0100, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > Hi, [snip] > Well, I made it work on OpenBSD i386, and I can say it runs on sparc and > sparc64 too. I try to get my VAX Station up and running, to test it there > too. Further I plan on getting my hands on a HPPA and MIPS base

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] tools/ccdv

2008-03-04 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008-03-04T15:12:25, Sebastian Reitenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Well, I made it work on OpenBSD i386, and I can say it runs on sparc and > > sparc64 too. I try to get my VAX Station up and running, to test it there > > too. Further

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] tools/ccdv

2008-03-04 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2008-03-04T15:12:25, Sebastian Reitenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, I made it work on OpenBSD i386, and I can say it runs on sparc and > sparc64 too. I try to get my VAX Station up and running, to test it there > too. Further I plan on getting my hands on a HPPA and MIPS based machin

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] tools/ccdv

2008-03-04 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
Hi, High-Availability Linux Development List wrote: > On 2008-03-03T14:31:36, David Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > BTW, David, I'm pretty sure your latest change has broken this - ccdv > > > cannot be build using $(CC), as $(CC) requires ccdv to be present. > > Hmmm... OK. The reason

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] tools/ccdv

2008-03-04 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2008-03-03T14:31:36, David Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > BTW, David, I'm pretty sure your latest change has broken this - ccdv > > cannot be build using $(CC), as $(CC) requires ccdv to be present. > Hmmm... OK. The reason I made that change was that someone had reported > build failure o

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] portability

2008-03-04 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2008-03-03T17:10:10, David Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But if any patch causes any trouble, feel free to back it out; they should > all be independent of each other. But preferably do so in an amended form > that includes a comment about why the original code was the way it was. Hi David