Hi,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 02:03:55PM +0900, Satomi Taniguchi wrote:
Hi,
I fixed some bugs in hbagent.
This patch is for Heartbeat2.1stable-dev(0e53afc9c19f) and
PacemakerPythonGUI-dev(93555986c6c2).
The patch's roles are:
1) modify arguments of decode_transition_magic() according to
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 06:41:11AM -0700, Joe Bill wrote:
if (strcmp(logtype, ha-log) == 0){
priority = LOG_INFO;
} else if (strcmp(logtype, ha-debug) == 0){
priority = LOG_DEBUG;
}else{
goto err_exit;
}
Can anybody give the reason why ha_logger.c limits
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 09:12:59AM -0700, Joe Bill wrote:
The online Linux-HA documentation regarding HA logging
appears confusing and misleading to me on several occasions,
noticeably caused by describing the HA logging broker
(http://www.linux-ha.org/GettingStartedV2) as some syslog-like
2008/6/19 Keisuke MORI [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Xinwei Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm the one who opposed sfex in the previous discussion.
My point was simple that:
check-and-reserve on disk is not an atomic CAS operation. and lock
based on that may silently cause data corruption.
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 09:26:13PM +0800, Xinwei Hu wrote:
2008/6/19 Keisuke MORI [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Xinwei Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm the one who opposed sfex in the previous discussion.
My point was simple that:
check-and-reserve on disk is not an atomic CAS
2008/6/19 Dejan Muhamedagic [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 09:26:13PM +0800, Xinwei Hu wrote:
2008/6/19 Keisuke MORI [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Xinwei Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm the one who opposed sfex in the previous discussion.
My point was simple that:
--- On Thu, 6/19/08, Dejan Muhamedagic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Dejan Muhamedagic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aren't both HA logging daemon and Heartbeat logging deamon
different enough from system logging daemon or syslog?
As a logging daemon, I would expect that component to replace syslogd.
On 2008-06-19T22:52:55, Xinwei Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True. It is possible to break sfex, but the probability that that
is going to happen is extremely low and could be due only to a
very pathological timing. One way to make this probability still
From my previous experience, I
2008/6/20 Lars Marowsky-Bree [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 2008-06-19T22:52:55, Xinwei Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True. It is possible to break sfex, but the probability that that
is going to happen is extremely low and could be due only to a
very pathological timing. One way to make this
