On 2010-12-10 13:42, alexander.kra...@basf.com wrote:
> So, best thing would be, as you already said: remove it from the
> environment. I could just save your time answering stupid questions.
Seconded.
> @Florian: Isn't OCF_CHECK_LEVEL also missing in the guide ?
> And thank you very much for sec
> >> >> No Section:
> >> >> Is there a reason, why the environment variable
> >> >> 'OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_role', which is set in the monitor action,
> >> >> isn't mentioned anywhere ?
> >> >
> >> > Make a good case for it to be explained, and convince me that it
won't
> >> > just serve to confuse e
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:31 PM, wrote:
>> >
>> >> No Section:
>> >> Is there a reason, why the environment variable
>> >> 'OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_role', which is set in the monitor action,
>> >> isn't mentioned anywhere ?
>> >
>> > Make a good case for it to be explained, and convince me that it w
> >
> >> No Section:
> >> Is there a reason, why the environment variable
> >> 'OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_role', which is set in the monitor action,
> >> isn't mentioned anywhere ?
> >
> > Make a good case for it to be explained, and convince me that it won't
> > just serve to confuse everybody, and I'll
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
> On 2010-12-08 18:15, alexander.kra...@basf.com wrote:
>> Hi Florian,
>>
>> Section 5.10:
>> The variables are missing a "notify". It is:
>> OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_notify_start_uname
>> not
>> OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_start_uname
>
> Thanks! Fixed.
>
On 2010-12-08 18:15, alexander.kra...@basf.com wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
> Section 5.10:
> The variables are missing a "notify". It is:
> OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_notify_start_uname
> not
> OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_start_uname
Thanks! Fixed.
http://people.linbit.com/~florian/ra-dev-guide/_literal_notify_lit
On 2010-12-07 02:33, Tim Serong wrote:
>> On a different matter:
>>
>> Perhaps it would be good to add a section about ocf-tester. Or
>> would you consider that out of scope?
>
> Speaking of out-of-scope... A question came up the other day on
> #linux-cluster about if there's any documentati
On 2010-12-06 19:20, Alan Robertson wrote:
> On 12/06/2010 09:35 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>> On a different matter:
>>
>> Perhaps it would be good to add a section about ocf-tester. Or
>> would you consider that out of scope?
>
> Let me second that request. If you don't know about ocf-tester,
