On 2011-02-07 17:44, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
> Hello -
>
> First of all thanks for doing this. It's definitely a neat option to
> have. Unfortunately I haven't yet worked with ProstgreSQL 9.0. Could
> you please elaborate little bit more on how it works? What happens if
> master dies? Who is respon
Hello -
First of all thanks for doing this. It's definitely a neat option to
have. Unfortunately I haven't yet worked with ProstgreSQL 9.0. Could
you please elaborate little bit more on how it works? What happens if
master dies? Who is responsible for creating/deleting recovery.conf
file?
Also pl
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 12:31 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:27:38PM +0100, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 11:46 +0100, Florian Haas wrote:
> > > On 2011-02-07 11:38, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > As conclusion:
> > > > 1)
> > > > R
Hello
I wrote a patch for pgsql RA to manage PostgreSQL 9.0 streaming
replication(PGSR)
which is new feature in Postgres 9.0.
I add new parameters, "rep_mode", "trigger_file" and "tmpdir".
"rep_mode" means replication mode
Default is "none" which do the same thing as before.
You have to set "asy
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:27:38PM +0100, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 11:46 +0100, Florian Haas wrote:
> > On 2011-02-07 11:38, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > As conclusion:
> > > 1)
> > > Rolling HADR into the existing agent seems impossible to me or
> > >
Hi Holger,
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 11:38:10AM +0100, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 08:42 +0100, Florian Haas wrote:
> > Hello Holger,
> >
> > that would be excellent functionality to have, thanks very much for the
> > contribution! Is there any chance this could be rolled into the
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 11:46 +0100, Florian Haas wrote:
> On 2011-02-07 11:38, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> > [...]
> > As conclusion:
> > 1)
> > Rolling HADR into the existing agent seems impossible to me or
> > at least will end in a pollution of if and case statement and
> > ov
On 2011-02-07 11:38, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> [...]
> As conclusion:
> 1)
> Rolling HADR into the existing agent seems impossible to me or
> at least will end in a pollution of if and case statement and
> over complex logic.
>
> 2)
> Adding support for a standard dat
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 08:42 +0100, Florian Haas wrote:
> Hello Holger,
>
> that would be excellent functionality to have, thanks very much for the
> contribution! Is there any chance this could be rolled into the existing
> db2 agent? You could use the ocf_is_ms() function to detect whether the
>
