On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 11:46 +0100, Florian Haas wrote: > On 2011-02-07 11:38, Holger Teutsch wrote: > > [...] > > As conclusion: > > 1) > > Rolling HADR into the existing agent seems impossible to me or > > at least will end in a pollution of if and case statement and > > over complex logic. > > > > 2) > > Adding support for a standard database in the one instance / one > > db model is feasible. As explained above this will not be > > 'binary' compatible to the existing agent. > > > > 3) > > The db2 agent seems to have a long and complex heritage as agent > > for different HA solutions or as standalone script so a major > > refurbishment is on my To-Do list anyhow. > > Moving common code into a helper script as 'library' to be > > shared by both agents might be an idea. > > > > Opinions ? > > Makes perfect sense to me. Thanks for sharing your thoughts! >
So I will go for 2) now and resubmit the agent afterwards. As a second step I will go for 3). > Cheers, > Florian > > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
