U Čet, 05. 05. 2011., u 10:25 +0200, Florian Haas je napisao/la:
> Andres already knows this, but FWIW I'll repost here that I'll be at UDS
> in time for the cluster stack session at 12 noon on 5/12. I'll stay in
> Budapest that evening and will probably join the Budapest sightseeing
> tour that t
Hi,
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 09:17:13PM +0930, Darren Thompson wrote:
> Team
>
> I stand corrected Looking at all the other ocf files, it does appear
> that the initialisation setting are consistent (and hence assumed
> correct).
>
> Oddly, the test environment I have setup is SLES11SP with
On 2011-05-05 14:26, Darren Thompson wrote:
>> Can you confirm that the current version is working for you and passes
>> ocf-tester on your system?
>
> What is an ocf-tester???
http://www.linux-ha.org/doc/dev-guides/_testing_installing_and_packaging_resource_agents.html
> I have been testing thi
Florian/Team
Comments in-line...
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 05:47 -0600,
linux-ha-dev-requ...@lists.linux-ha.org wrote:
> Darren,
>
> can you please subscribe to the list as a normal subscriber rather
> than
> to just the digest, so we can keep this discussion in one thread?
Ok, done... The dige
Team
I stand corrected Looking at all the other ocf files, it does appear
that the initialisation setting are consistent (and hence assumed
correct).
Oddly, the test environment I have setup is SLES11SP with the High
Availability add-on and the path to the ocf directory is radically
differen
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Lars Ellenberg
wrote:
> Services running under Pacemaker control are probably "critical",
> so a malicious person with even only "stop" access on the CIB
> can do a DoS. I guess we have to assume people with any write access
> at all to the CIB are "trusted", an
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
> Rather than going into ACLs in more detail, I wanted to highlight that
> however we limit access to the CIB, the resource agents still _execute_
> as root, so we will always have what would normally be considered a
> privilege escalation issue.
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
> On 2011-04-26 19:33, Andres Rodriguez wrote:
>> UDS' are open-to-public events, and I believe it would be great if
>> upstream could participate and maybe even further the discussion about
>> the Cluster Stack. For more information about UDS,
On 2011-04-26 19:33, Andres Rodriguez wrote:
> UDS' are open-to-public events, and I believe it would be great if
> upstream could participate and maybe even further the discussion about
> the Cluster Stack. For more information about UDS, please visit [1]. The
> specific date/time for the Cluster
Darren,
can you please subscribe to the list as a normal subscriber rather than
to just the digest, so we can keep this discussion in one thread?
On 2011-05-05 04:47, Darren Thompson wrote:
> Florian/Team
>
> There was an error in the GIT-Hub version that was causing my re-base
> attempts to fai
Rather than going into ACLs in more detail, I wanted to highlight that
however we limit access to the CIB, the resource agents still _execute_
as root, so we will always have what would normally be considered a
privilege escalation issue.
Now, we could agree on security guidelines for RAs, and som
11 matches
Mail list logo
