Hi,
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:12:13AM +, Simon Talbot wrote:
A couple of observations (I am sure there are more) on the uniqueness flag
for OCF script parameters:
I knew there are going to be quite a few :)
Would it be wise for the for the index parameter of the SFEX ocf script to
Hi all,
Is this something that should be pushed before the new release?
Has it been well tested?
Cheers,
Dejan
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 07:22:11AM +0100, Ben Mildren wrote:
Hi Marek
I've tested from 5.0+. What's the status with the projects support fro pre
5.0 versions - they're obviously
On 2011-06-14 13:08, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi Alan,
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:32:02AM -0600, Alan Robertson wrote:
On 06/13/2011 04:12 AM, Simon Talbot wrote:
A couple of observations (I am sure there are more) on the uniqueness flag
for OCF script parameters:
Would it be wise for
Hi Florian,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 02:03:19PM +0200, Florian Haas wrote:
On 2011-06-14 13:08, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi Alan,
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:32:02AM -0600, Alan Robertson wrote:
On 06/13/2011 04:12 AM, Simon Talbot wrote:
A couple of observations (I am sure there are
On 06/10/2011 09:07 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
mhm ... one problem is that i cannot distinguish between an inital
probe and a probe from crm resource reprobe.
when i do this, my current postfix ocf ra reports not running,
Even though it is started? Well, that sounds like a problem. But
I
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 05:45:21PM +0200, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote:
this caused errors for the initial probe, so i did the following change:
LSB_STATUS_STOPPED=3
if [ $ret -ne $OCF_SUCCESS ] || ocf_is_probe; then
(see the new ocf_is_probe?)
case $1 in
stop) exit $OCF_SUCCESS ;;
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 06:05:23PM +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 05:45:21PM +0200, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote:
this caused errors for the initial probe, so i did the following change:
LSB_STATUS_STOPPED=3
if [ $ret -ne $OCF_SUCCESS ] || ocf_is_probe; then
(see
Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 08.06.2011 18:32:16:
Hi Alexander,
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 05:42:30PM +0200, alexander.kra...@basf.com
wrote:
Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 04.04.2011 14:35:34:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 04:15:16PM +0100, alexander.kra...@basf.com
wrote:
Hi,
Dejan
Hello -
I've just sent a pull request from my fork of resource-agent git repository.
Proposed patch adds better handling of probes, fixes one English misspelling
and declares rc variable as local in some function where it's used.
I hope I did everything right with git
--
Serge Dubrouski.
Hi Raoul,
to my knowledge, the ra's output is logged by pacemaker.
moreover, postfix logs to the mail facility itself.
what are the reasons for separately capturing and logging
all output?
When a problem occurred, the output of detailed log helps an operator.
In addition, pacemaker
10 matches
Mail list logo
