Hi Raoul,
I confirmed movement of postfix in the next environment.
* RHEL5 - postfix 2.3.3
* RHEL6 - postfix 2.6.6
The postfix ra worked well.
However, my patch made a mistake.
I do not seem to get the result of postfix status.
It is necessary to watch log of postfix in the details of the pr
On 2011-06-15 15:50, Alan Robertson wrote:
> On 06/14/2011 06:03 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
>> On 2011-06-14 13:08, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>>> Hi Alan,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:32:02AM -0600, Alan Robertson wrote:
On 06/13/2011 04:12 AM, Simon Talbot wrote:
> A couple of observati
On 06/14/2011 07:21 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 02:03:19PM +0200, Florian Haas wrote:
>> On 2011-06-14 13:08, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>>> Hi Alan,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:32:02AM -0600, Alan Robertson wrote:
On 06/13/2011 04:12 AM, Simon T
On 06/14/2011 06:03 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
> On 2011-06-14 13:08, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>> Hi Alan,
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:32:02AM -0600, Alan Robertson wrote:
>>> On 06/13/2011 04:12 AM, Simon Talbot wrote:
A couple of observations (I am sure there are more) on the uniqueness fl
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 07:15:21PM +0200, alexander.kra...@basf.com wrote:
> Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 08.06.2011 18:32:16:
> > Hi Alexander,
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 05:42:30PM +0200, alexander.kra...@basf.com
> wrote:
> > > Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 04.04.2011 14:35:34:
> > > > On Fri,
On 2011-06-15 14:26, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
> I screwed up with git so here is the patch attached.
Merged. I took the liberty to split this into two patches, and drop the
spelling fix because the original spelling is actually correct. :)
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/commit/f64c7
On 06/15/2011 02:29 PM, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
> Yes it's right.
>
> Do you know how I can resync my fork to the upstream?
git fetch upstream
git rebase upstream/master
provided that you've got a remote "upstream", e.g.
> [remote "upstream"]
> url = https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resourc
Yes it's right.
Do you know how I can resync my fork to the upstream?
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
> On 2011-06-15 14:26, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
> > I screwed up with git so here is the patch attached.
>
> Nice, thanks. Is the pgsql ocft test case OK as it is in the repo?
On 2011-06-15 14:26, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
> I screwed up with git so here is the patch attached.
Nice, thanks. Is the pgsql ocft test case OK as it is in the repo?
Cheers,
Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Lin
I screwed up with git so here is the patch attached.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
> Hello -
>
> I've just sent a pull request from my fork of resource-agent git
> repository. Proposed patch adds better handling of probes, fixes one English
> misspelling and declares rc
Hi Raoul,
I'm sorry.
I was weak in English, and it confused you.
> please refetch one last time from
> https://github.com/raoulbhatia/resource-agents/blob/master/heartbeat/postfix
>
> i think i got the probing issue fixed!
I confirm movement and will inform it of a result tomorrow.
Best Regard
On 06/14/2011 06:05 PM, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 05:45:21PM +0200, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote:
>> this caused errors for the initial probe, so i did the following change:
>>
>>> LSB_STATUS_STOPPED=3
>>> if [ $ret -ne $OCF_SUCCESS ] || ocf_is_probe; then
>> (see the new ocf_is_
Hi Hideo-san!
On 06/15/2011 10:53 AM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> Hi Raoul,
>
> Thank you for comment.
>
>> please test the postfix ra from my repository:
>> https://github.com/raoulbhatia/resource-agents/blob/master/heartbeat/postfix
>>
>> there is a "minor" issue regarding probes and
Hi Raoul,
> ok, i'll do that.
> did you get a chance to test the latest and greatest postfix ocf ra?
Thank you for comment.
I do not yet test it in latest postfix.
I intended to test it after it was committed.
If a test is necessary, I participate in a test.
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
___
On 06/15/2011 04:19 AM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> Hi Raoul,
>
>>> to my knowledge, the ra's output is logged by pacemaker.
>>> moreover, postfix logs to the mail facility itself.
>>>
>>> what are the reasons for separately capturing and logging
>>> all output?
>>
>> When a problem occurr
15 matches
Mail list logo
