Hi,
here is a second one. Ok to just post the URL's ? Or should the diff still
be send to the mailing list ?
https://github.com/AlexanderKrauth/resource-agents/commit/4fdd1a420f23abc5005fa290a33d7fa902571d55
Thanks
Alex
___
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux
Hi,
my first try doing a patch with the new github repo. Can you please check
my last push. Is it ok to issue a pull request ?
https://github.com/AlexanderKrauth/resource-agents/commit/3acc297348c39dff6107e4c87ce666f98161ae9c
https://github.com/AlexanderKrauth/resource-agents/commit/3d511867233
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 11:42:23AM +0100, alexander.kra...@basf.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my first try doing a patch with the new github repo. Can you please check
> my last push. Is it ok to issue a pull request ?
Looks fine to me.
Cheers,
Dejan
> https://github.com/AlexanderKrauth/resource-
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 11:42:26AM +0100, alexander.kra...@basf.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is a second one. Ok to just post the URL's ? Or should the diff still
> be send to the mailing list ?
If you submit a pull request the maintainers get an email about
it. That should be enough. Of cours
Hi Dejan,
It has been recommended, that required options should not have default
values. The initial version of the script had a default for that
variable, but chrooted_path was not required. During the revision's
suggested by Andreas and Florian, chrooted was converted into a
required, and un
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 01:39:04PM -0400, Chris Bowlby wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Ok, I'll look into csync, and will concede the point on the RA syncing
>> the out of chrooted configuration file.
>>
>> I still need to find a means t
Hi Florian,
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 03:43:43PM +0100, Florian Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 01:39:04PM -0400, Chris Bowlby wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> Ok, I'll look into csync, and will concede the point on the R
Hi Chris,
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 10:33:05AM -0400, Chris Bowlby wrote:
> Hi Dejan,
>
> It has been recommended, that required options should not have default
> values.
Definitely they cannot have defaults. Sorry, I should've been
more precise.
> The initial version of the script had a default
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 10:33:05AM -0400, Chris Bowlby wrote:
>> Hi Dejan,
>>
>> It has been recommended, that required options should not have default
>> values.
>
> Definitely they cannot have defaults. Sorry, I should've b
