Hi Lars,
Thank all of you for reviewing and making a suggestion.
I think I understand your point as the Heartbeat architecture,
but it would require re-writing the code almost all ;-)
I will discuss with my colleagues about what we can do for procd
as the next step.
Lars Marowsky-Bree [EMAIL
On 2008-04-08T06:56:25, Serge Dubrouski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- RAs should sign in with it for the processes they want monitored,
instead of listing the processes in the procd configuration section
(means it gets decoupled from the CIB further). The RAs could write a
record to
On 2008-04-09T06:43:13, Serge Dubrouski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whatever principles make sense for the specific RA - according to
instance attributes specified, the current role etc. The RA really knows
best.
Right, but that doesn't mean that they know user best. As I see it a
user
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 02:45:12PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2008-02-27T20:39:13, Keisuke MORI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Keisuke-san,
thanks for your patch and contribution. I have to apologize in the name
of everyone for the late feedback.
I really appreciate the idea
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:45 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-02-27T20:39:13, Keisuke MORI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Keisuke-san,
thanks for your patch and contribution. I have to apologize in the name
of everyone for the late feedback.
I really appreciate the
