Hi,
Just a few comments below.
Cheers,
Dejan
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:52:12AM +0200, Christian Franke wrote:
Hello Florian,
Your question is fully justified - I sincerely apologize for ignoring
that comprehensive documentation.
I rewrote the patch trying to adhere to the requirements
On 2012-04-04T01:52:12, Christian Franke nob...@nowhere.ws wrote:
Hello Florian,
Your question is fully justified - I sincerely apologize for ignoring
that comprehensive documentation.
I rewrote the patch trying to adhere to the requirements given in the
documentation.
Hi Christian,
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 02:55:52PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2012-04-04T01:52:12, Christian Franke nob...@nowhere.ws wrote:
Hello Florian,
Your question is fully justified - I sincerely apologize for ignoring
that comprehensive documentation.
I rewrote the patch trying
On 04/04/2012 02:55 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
that patch shares a *lot* of code with IPaddr(2), doesn't it?
I wonder if that wouldn't benefit from refactoring, moving shared
functions to an include?
Thanks for your feedback, I will have a look at that - the gratuitous
arp and also some
Hi Christian,
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 06:00:45PM +0200, Christian Franke wrote:
On 04/04/2012 02:55 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
that patch shares a *lot* of code with IPaddr(2), doesn't it?
I wonder if that wouldn't benefit from refactoring, moving shared
functions to an include?
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Christian Franke nob...@nowhere.ws wrote:
Hello Florian,
Your question is fully justified - I sincerely apologize for ignoring
that comprehensive documentation.
I rewrote the patch trying to adhere to the requirements given in the
documentation.
Wow, that is
Hello Florian,
Your question is fully justified - I sincerely apologize for ignoring
that comprehensive documentation.
I rewrote the patch trying to adhere to the requirements given in the
documentation.
Best Regards,
Christian
---
AUTHORS |1 +
doc/man/Makefile.am |1
