Hi all,
we have a quite inconvenient mix of licenses in the code. Some are
# License: GNU General Public License (GPL)
others
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of version 2 of the GNU General Public License as
# published by the Fre
On 2007-12-07T16:11:25, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ping? I think this is a fairly important question. The problem is that
having asked it, ignoring it in good faith is kind of hard, which could
be an issue for anyone distributing heartbeat ...
Regards,
Lars
> Hi all,
Hi,
High-Availability Linux Development List
wrote:
> On 2007-12-07T16:11:25, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ping? I think this is a fairly important question. The problem is that
> having asked it, ignoring it in good faith is kind of hard, which could
> be an issue for anyone
Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
Ping? I think this is a fairly important question. The problem is that
having asked it, ignoring it in good faith is kind of hard, which could
be an issue for anyone distributing heartbeat ...
>
personally, I'd prefer the BSD or ISC license, as these are short, and mo
On 2007-12-11T22:14:36, Sebastian Reitenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> personally, I'd prefer the BSD or ISC license, as these are short, and more
> important, I understand them. fwiw, for the small bits I contributed, feel
> free to change it to any GPL version necessary.
I don't think a non-
