Hi all,
I'd like to propose the following changes to happen in the next
heartbeat release, which I'd name 2.2.0 because of them.
As the formerly-known-as-CRM component is now developed as the PaceMaker
project, the corresponding code should be removed from the heartbeat
project itself, as it will
How will be *.spec files organized and who will support them? Before
this release there was just one heartbeat.spec file that one could use
to build RPMs, how is it going to be handled in the future?
On Jan 29, 2008 2:31 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to p
On 2008-01-29T09:23:35, Serge Dubrouski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How will be *.spec files organized and who will support them? Before
> this release there was just one heartbeat.spec file that one could use
> to build RPMs, how is it going to be handled in the future?
Well, in what I outlined
On 2008-01-29T10:31:35, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to propose the following changes to happen in the next
> heartbeat release, which I'd name 2.2.0 because of them.
... If noone has any remaining objections, I suppose we could go ahead
with this in the i
On Feb 3, 2008, at 6:49 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2008-01-29T10:31:35, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to propose the following changes to happen in the next
heartbeat release, which I'd name 2.2.0 because of them.
... If noone has any remaining object
On 2008-02-06T16:28:41, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There don't seem to be any (I think we exhausted the testing discussion)...
> are you waiting for me to do it?
Sure, feel free to; at least I have no objections.
I wonder if we could add a Recommends/Requires: pacemaker or what
On Feb 6, 2008, at 4:55 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2008-02-06T16:28:41, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There don't seem to be any (I think we exhausted the testing
discussion)...
are you waiting for me to do it?
Sure, feel free to; at least I have no objections.
I wonder
On 2008-02-07T10:45:00, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Saying "Requires: pacemaker" doesn't seem like a good idea though
True, people who wish to run v1 only don't need Pacemaker installed.
Regards,
Lars
--
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Produc
