On 2006-06-12T09:04:45, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No one reads the help text. They just get it wrong.
BTW, Andrew raised a very valid point - if they get it wrong, wouldn't
the best approach have been to make that script accept the netmask both
in a.b.c.d and CIDR notiation? It's
On 2006-06-09T13:01:32, linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org wrote:
linux-ha CVS committal
Author : alan
Host:
Project : linux-ha
Module : resources
Dir : linux-ha/resources/OCF
Modified Files:
IPaddr.in IPaddr2.in
Log Message:
Updated the name of netmask to
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-06-09T13:01:32, linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org wrote:
linux-ha CVS committal
Author : alan
Host:
Project : linux-ha
Module : resources
Dir : linux-ha/resources/OCF
Modified Files:
IPaddr.in IPaddr2.in
Log Message:
Updated the name of
On 2006-06-12T09:04:45, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No one reads the help text. They just get it wrong.
If you say so...
It was wrong from the beginning. It is not the only mistake, I'm
afraid... But, it's the only one that seems to cause customers problems.
I changed it
Xun Sun wrote:
On 1/11/06, linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org
linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org wrote:
linux-ha CVS committal
Author : alan
Host:
Project : linux-ha
Module : resources
Dir : linux-ha/resources/OCF
Modified Files:
Filesystem.in
Log Message:
Changed Fileystem to
