On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:20:48AM +0100, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2011-03-14T19:49:29, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> > I suspect you want b) with maybe 6 people for redundancy.
> > The pull request workflow should be well suited to a project like this
> > and impose minimal overhead.
>
> I pr
On 2011-03-14T19:49:29, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> I suspect you want b) with maybe 6 people for redundancy.
> The pull request workflow should be well suited to a project like this
> and impose minimal overhead.
I prefer b as well, since it adds another review step. (Should we use
the github.com c
Hi Holger,
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 09:16:30AM +0100, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 18:07 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > It's time to figure out how to maintain the new Resource Agents
> > repository. Fabio and I already discussed this a bit in IRC.
>
On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 18:07 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> It's time to figure out how to maintain the new Resource Agents
> repository. Fabio and I already discussed this a bit in IRC.
> There are two options:
>
> a) everybody gets an account at github.com and commit righ
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> It's time to figure out how to maintain the new Resource Agents
> repository. Fabio and I already discussed this a bit in IRC.
> There are two options:
>
> a) everybody gets an account at github.com and commit rights,
Hello everybody,
It's time to figure out how to maintain the new Resource Agents
repository. Fabio and I already discussed this a bit in IRC.
There are two options:
a) everybody gets an account at github.com and commit rights,
where everybody is all people who had commit rights to
linux-ha.
