Re: Log Program for Linux

2000-05-15 Thread zipher
> On Thu, 11 May 2000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > > At the same time, we've agreed that no single front end will suffice > > for both contesting and casual QSOs. So since we accept that multiple > > front ends can be needed, they can differ in implementation too. I don't > > think a

Re: off topic!

2000-05-15 Thread Dexter N. Muir
At 10:08 15/05/00 +0100, Geoff Blake wrote: >Hey, hold on a moment - it may be some time since I played with 10base2 >(We still have some at work, but if it ain't broke - they haven't >required fixing for 5 years or so!) but a hundred stations, no way! > >However, ISTR that a maximum of 10/15 stat

Re: off topic!

2000-05-15 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 11:09:03AM -0300, Jean Letourneau (VE9PT) wrote: > On Sun, 14 May 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hi > > Sorry this is an big off topic but not sure where else to ask > > so any help will be great > > ok i have three machines that are tie together with ethernet using

Re: Question, was; [ANNOUNCE] new-AX.25 for 2.2.14 Rel. 5

2000-05-15 Thread Tomi Manninen OH2BNS
On Sun, 14 May 2000, Stewart Wilkinson wrote: > Gerd wrote: > > > > > > Do you have a case where this leads to actual problems so we can see if > > > something needs to be fixed? > > > > Yes, I am aware of such a case. You run into problems when a > > user enters a node on L2, goes out on L2 aga

Re: PSK-31 rig from small wonders lab

2000-05-15 Thread Bob Nielsen
I asked this question of Dave Benson (NN1G, the designer) and he replied that it is not dependent on DigiPan and should work with any PSK31 software. He realized that the web site implied that DigiPan was required and I believe he is planning to reword that. There is some PSK31 software linked f

newqpsk?

2000-05-15 Thread Ken Koster
I'm all setup to use newqpsk and need somebody to talk to. (hmm, sounds like a Country and Western song title :-) Anyone else out there using it on a regular basis? I'm already aware of the 3590 frequency, but that's a bit far from Washington state. Anything on other bands, and or closer? Ken,

Re: off topic!

2000-05-15 Thread Geoff Blake
On Mon, 15 May 2000, Chuck Gelm wrote: > |- 1500 feet or less--| > terminator-T-coax-T-coax-T- . -T-terminator > bncbncbncbnc > nicnicnic

PSK-31 rig from small wonders lab

2000-05-15 Thread Jim Apple
I'm pretty new to PSK-31 and Linux, is there any software available that would likely work with this new rig. http://smallwonderlabs.com/swl_psk31.html It's designed with DigiPan in mind, but I was hoping one of the Linux PSK-31 programs might have a similar set of capabilities. Thanks

Announcement: Configurable message filter for XFBB

2000-05-15 Thread Bela Markus
DIXMF is a flexible message filter for LINUX FBB, developed to meet requirements of FBB BBS sysops, reducing time spent to supervise mails going through their system. DIXMF can kill, archive or hold specific messages, or copy them to export files for archiving purposes or to be processed by other

Re: off topic!

2000-05-15 Thread Geoff Blake
Hey, hold on a moment - it may be some time since I played with 10base2 (We still have some at work, but if it ain't broke - they haven't required fixing for 5 years or so!) but a hundred stations, no way! However, ISTR that a maximum of 10/15 stations a segment and a maximum of 5 segments to

Re: off topic!

2000-05-15 Thread Jean Letourneau (VE9PT)
Hi Bob, Here I have 7 computers all connected on thin coax. The only thing I can think of. is Impedence mistmatch, or a faulty card. As long there is terminators at the end of the line all should work OK. Maybe try a diff. card. 73 de Jean --- Please replies to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 73 de J

Re: Log Program for Linux

2000-05-15 Thread Jorge Matias
On Thu, 11 May 2000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 07:34:58AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > At the same time, we've agreed that no single front end will suffice > for both contesting and casual QSOs. So since we accept that multiple > front ends can be needed, they can di

Re: off topic!

2000-05-15 Thread Chuck Gelm
|- 1500 feet or less--| terminator-T-coax-T-coax-T- . -T-terminator bncbncbncbnc nicnicnicnic computer comput

Re: off topic!

2000-05-15 Thread Richard Adams
On Mon, 15 May 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about, off topic!: > Hi > Sorry this is an big off topic but not sure where else to ask > so any help will be great > ok i have three machines that are tie together with ethernet using > thincoax bnc type > it seems all works ok with two bnc connecto