On Sat, 24 Jun 2000, Robin Gilks wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, you wrote:
> >
> > The reason it doesn't work is because TCP/IP does not work that
> > way. TCP/IP is based on the assumption that every computer on a
> > network segment (NOT subnet) can hear all of the other computers
> > on the
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, you wrote:
[snip]
> 2) somewhere in one of the networking HOWTOs is a way to
> assign two IP numbers to the same network port. arrange the
> subnetting and IP numbers so that all the machines that one of
> your remote machines is on the same subnet as one of the IP #s,
>
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, you wrote:
>
> The reason it doesn't work is because TCP/IP does not work that
> way. TCP/IP is based on the assumption that every computer on a
> network segment (NOT subnet) can hear all of the other computers
> on the same segment.
It worked fine up to 2.0 series kerne
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about, Re: Kernel IP routing bug:
> The reason it doesn't work is because TCP/IP does not work that
> way. TCP/IP is based on the assumption that every computer on a
> network segment (NOT subnet) can hear all of the other computers
On 20 Jun 00, at 0:15, Richard Adams wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, Robin Gilks wrote about, Kernel IP routing bug:
> > Greeting all
> >
> > Has anyone found a fix yet for the routing bug in 2.2 kernels that I
> > highlighted about 5 months ago?
> >
> >
Message-Id: 2681_kb2shu
From: kb2shu@kb2shu.#sca.ca.usa.noam
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Saw this on another list, not sure if it will help.
- Forwarded message -
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 20 10:21:54 2000
Received: from delphi.wagate.com [204.137.132.198] by kb2shu.ampr.org (TNOS2.3
On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, you wrote:
>
> Are we talking along the same lines.???
>
Hi Richard
Yup - thats the one. Been bugging me for months not to mention using an extra
port up to avoid in & out on the same interface (seperate TX & RX ports).
I spent a long time looking into the code but didn't
Tomi Manninen OH2BNS wrote:
>
> The solution is for someone to dig in the kernel networking code and find
> out what is going on. I once did that but as the networking code is rather
> confusing and the bug doesn't currently affect me, I soon lost interest.
>
> The other solution is to wait for
On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Arno Verhoeven wrote:
> Robin Gilks wrote:
> >
> > Has anyone found a fix yet for the routing bug in 2.2 kernels that I
> > highlighted about 5 months ago?
>
> Funny... Last weekend I saw the very same thing on our packet radio
> node. I was just about to send a question ab
Robin Gilks wrote:
>
> Greeting all
>
> Has anyone found a fix yet for the routing bug in 2.2 kernels that I
> highlighted about 5 months ago?
>
> At the time there was a lot of prattle about netmasks (total waste of space)
> and such where a simple point-to-point route could not be established
On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, Robin Gilks wrote about, Kernel IP routing bug:
> Greeting all
>
> Has anyone found a fix yet for the routing bug in 2.2 kernels that I
> highlighted about 5 months ago?
>
> At the time there was a lot of prattle about netmasks (total waste of space)
Greeting all
Has anyone found a fix yet for the routing bug in 2.2 kernels that I
highlighted about 5 months ago?
At the time there was a lot of prattle about netmasks (total waste of space)
and such where a simple point-to-point route could not be established, never
mind a subnet.
Summary
A p
12 matches
Mail list logo
