Re: Strange behaviour of ax25

1999-02-04 Thread Richard Adams
According to Julian =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mu=F1oz?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dom=EDnguez?=: While burning my CPU. > > Hello Richard, > > >Firstly one would imagen a t_2 timer time of 1.5 seconds far to short for a > >1k2 link. > > I am using this value long time with jnos, and that worked perfectly. It was > e

Re: Strange behaviour of ax25

1999-02-03 Thread ea4acl
Hello Richard, >Firstly one would imagen a t_2 timer time of 1.5 seconds far to short for a >1k2 link. I am using this value long time with jnos, and that worked perfectly. It was enough to piggy-back and to concatenate acks. In fact, it seems not to be the problem, because if t2 expires it shou

Re: Strange behaviour of ax25

1999-02-03 Thread Richard Adams
According to Julian =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mu=F1oz?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dom=EDnguez?=: While burning my CPU. > > > If the t2 timer expired before sending the I packet, the RR would be before it, > not after. > > I don't find any explanation. This happens sometimes. t2 is 15 (1,5 seg), at > 1200 bauds. >

Strange behaviour of ax25

1999-02-03 Thread ea4acl
Hello, I'd like to ask for help to the programmers of ax25. I am ananlyzing the behaviour of ax25 protocol in Linux, and I am seeing things that I am not able to understand, even looking the sources: Here an example, maybe related with ax25 timers. The remote station (ea4rct, running Linux) is s