Re: [patch 0/6] hwmon/coretemp: Hotplug fixes, cleanups and state machine conversion

2017-05-04 Thread Tommi Rantala
2017-04-23 18:01 GMT+03:00 Thomas Gleixner : > On Sat, 15 Apr 2017, Tommi Rantala wrote: > >> Testing with 4.10.8-200.fc25.x86_64: freezer, devices and platform are >> OK, it breaks at "processors". >> The screen stays off, and the machine no longer answers to ping. >> >> (Without coretemp loaded,

Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (pmbus) Add missing break statements

2017-05-04 Thread walter harms
Am 04.05.2017 15:42, schrieb Guenter Roeck: > On 05/04/2017 12:31 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote: >> On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 09:28:19AM +0200, walter harms wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 03.05.2017 21:31, schrieb Dan Carpenter: Static checkers complain about these missing break statements. Fixes:

Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (pmbus) Add missing break statements

2017-05-04 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 05/04/2017 12:31 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote: On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 09:28:19AM +0200, walter harms wrote: Am 03.05.2017 21:31, schrieb Dan Carpenter: Static checkers complain about these missing break statements. Fixes: 6eaaea144dc5 ("hwmon: (pmbus) Add client driver for IR35221") Signed-of

Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (it87) Remove useless test during device detection

2017-05-04 Thread Jean Delvare
On Thu, 4 May 2017 11:35:06 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > There is no reason to treat the IT8705F differently during device > detection. If a single IT8705F chip indeed answers to both Super-IO > addresses, we have code in place to detect the duplicate device > address and skip the second one. > (..

[PATCH] hwmon: (it87) Remove useless test during device detection

2017-05-04 Thread Jean Delvare
There is no reason to treat the IT8705F differently during device detection. If a single IT8705F chip indeed answers to both Super-IO addresses, we have code in place to detect the duplicate device address and skip the second one. Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare Cc: Russell King Cc: Guenter Roeck -

Re: it87 causes VIA hardware to lockup

2017-05-04 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Guenter, On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 06:49:27 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 04/25/2017 06:30 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: > > I took a look at stable branches v4.9 and v4.10 and I can't find this > > fix. Do you still plan to check if the fix applies and poke Greg about > > it? Or do you want me to do it

Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (pmbus) Add missing break statements

2017-05-04 Thread Dan Carpenter
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 09:28:19AM +0200, walter harms wrote: > > > Am 03.05.2017 21:31, schrieb Dan Carpenter: > > Static checkers complain about these missing break statements. > > > > Fixes: 6eaaea144dc5 ("hwmon: (pmbus) Add client driver for IR35221") > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > > >

Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (pmbus) Add missing break statements

2017-05-04 Thread walter harms
Am 03.05.2017 21:31, schrieb Dan Carpenter: > Static checkers complain about these missing break statements. > > Fixes: 6eaaea144dc5 ("hwmon: (pmbus) Add client driver for IR35221") > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ir35221.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ir35221.c >