Hi,
I recently upgraded a machine that backs up data at a club from a
2.6.30 based distribution to 4.8.0 based distribution, and I find
that modprobing the it87 sensor driver on 4.8.0 causes the machine
to lockup.
Unfortunately, as far as I'm aware, there is no kernel oops or
kernel messages, it
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 10:34:13AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently upgraded a machine that backs up data at a club from a
> 2.6.30 based distribution to 4.8.0 based distribution, and I find
> that modprobing the it87 sensor driver on 4.8.0 causes the machine
> to lockup
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 06:25:44AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> I found some reference suggesting that The IT8705F may respond on
> both SIO addresses. Can you try the following patch ?
Thanks for the patch - it'll take about a week or so for me to test,
as I can only risk testing it when I'm phy
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 02:15:22PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 06:25:44AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > I found some reference suggesting that The IT8705F may respond on
> > both SIO addresses. Can you try the following patch ?
>
> Thanks for the patch - it'l
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 07:26:34AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 02:15:22PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 06:25:44AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > I found some reference suggesting that The IT8705F may respond on
> > > both SIO addres
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 06:44:30AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 07:26:34AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 02:15:22PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 06:25:44AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > I found some ref
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 02:08:12PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 06:44:30AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 07:26:34AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 02:15:22PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > > On Su
Hi Guenter,
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:05:03 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> I'll submit the patch as-is upstream; at least it doesn't break anything.
> If it doesn't fix your problem, we'll have to look at it again at a later
> point.
Given that this patch fixes a regression in kernels v4.7 to v.4.10,
On Sun, Apr 09, 2017 at 03:38:06PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:05:03 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > I'll submit the patch as-is upstream; at least it doesn't break anything.
> > If it doesn't fix your problem, we'll have to look at it again at a later
> > p
Hi Guenter,
On Sun, 9 Apr 2017 08:24:07 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 09, 2017 at 03:38:06PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:05:03 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > I'll submit the patch as-is upstream; at least it doesn't break anything.
> > > If it doesn't fix y
Hi Jean,
On 04/25/2017 06:30 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Guenter,
On Sun, 9 Apr 2017 08:24:07 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Sun, Apr 09, 2017 at 03:38:06PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:05:03 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
I'll submit the patch as-is upstream; at least it do
Hi Guenter,
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 06:49:27 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 04/25/2017 06:30 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > I took a look at stable branches v4.9 and v4.10 and I can't find this
> > fix. Do you still plan to check if the fix applies and poke Greg about
> > it? Or do you want me to do it
12 matches
Mail list logo
