Moin Wolfram,
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 08:15:04AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 09:17:51PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello Wolfram,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 01:42:01PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
From: Wolfram Sang wsa+rene...@sang-engineering.com
After
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 08:31:35AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
After more discussion, brave users, and additional datasheet
evaluation,
some API updates for the new I2C slave framework became imminent. The
slave events now get some easier to understand naming. Also, the event
After more discussion, brave users, and additional datasheet evaluation,
some API updates for the new I2C slave framework became imminent. The
slave events now get some easier to understand naming. Also, the event
handling has been simplified to only send one event per interrupt.
Hello Wolfram,
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 08:30:13AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
+Finally, Linux can also be an I2C slave in case I2C controllers have
slave
+support. Besides this HW requirement, one also needs a software backend
I wouldn't have written Finally, While it's great
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 09:17:51PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello Wolfram,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 01:42:01PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
From: Wolfram Sang wsa+rene...@sang-engineering.com
After more discussion, brave users, and additional datasheet evaluation,
some API updates
+Finally, Linux can also be an I2C slave in case I2C controllers have slave
+support. Besides this HW requirement, one also needs a software backend
I wouldn't have written Finally, While it's great that we have
slave support now, being enthusiastic here looks strange if someone
reads
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 08:44:47AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 08:31:35AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
After more discussion, brave users, and additional datasheet
evaluation,
some API updates for the new I2C slave framework became imminent.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 08:42:14AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello Wolfram,
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 08:30:13AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
+Finally, Linux can also be an I2C slave in case I2C controllers have
slave
+support. Besides this HW requirement, one also needs a
Ok, I see what you mean. I had a look at the place in question and
wonder what to return from i2c_add_mux_adapter() in the disabled
case so that i2c-mux-pinctrl is still happy with the returned value.
Ouch, you are right. The crux of interfaces returning NULL instead of an
ERR_PTR :( I'll
Hi,
On 03/18/2015 10:31 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Hi,
so, the bus recovery patches look fine to me in general.
It is only this one question left which I always had with bus recovery.
Maybe you guys can join me thinking about it.
Ok. Thanks and sorry for delayed reply - missed your e-mail :(
10 matches
Mail list logo