On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 02:51:41PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 04:57:08PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > According to the datasheets to n factor for dividing the tclk is
> > 2 to the power n on Allwinner SoCs, not 2 to the power n + 1 as it is
> > on other mv64xxx implemen
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 04:57:08PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> According to the datasheets to n factor for dividing the tclk is
> 2 to the power n on Allwinner SoCs, not 2 to the power n + 1 as it is
> on other mv64xxx implementations.
>
> I've contacted Allwinner about this and they have confir
Hey Wolfram,
On 20-10-15 17:58, Wolfram Sang wrote:
WIth Hans having figured it out and fixing it, I'll absolutly will take a
nother look and check with a scope if it all works out now.
Have you done this already? /me is always looking for Tested-by: tags :)
And here you have it.
Tested-by: O
I shamefully admit I have not. My plate is very full at the moment, but
I will make room for this upcoming weekend as I have a few other patches
to test aswell. Sorry for the delay!
On 20-10-15 18:58, Wolfram Sang wrote:
WIth Hans having figured it out and fixing it, I'll absolutly will take a
> WIth Hans having figured it out and fixing it, I'll absolutly will take a
> nother look and check with a scope if it all works out now.
Have you done this already? /me is always looking for Tested-by: tags :)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hey Maxime,
On 29-09-15 14:09, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 06:05:35PM +0200, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
Hey Hans,
On 27-09-15 16:57, Hans de Goede wrote:
According to the datasheets to n factor for dividing the tclk is
2 to the power n on Allwinner SoCs, not 2 to the power n + 1
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 06:53:03PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > >+ if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "allwinner,sun4i-a10-i2c") ||
> > >+ of_device_is_compatible(np, "allwinner,sun6i-a31-i2c"))
>
> Rather than have to extend this list every so often, how about adding
> a helper of_device_is_c
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 04:57:08PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> According to the datasheets to n factor for dividing the tclk is
> 2 to the power n on Allwinner SoCs, not 2 to the power n + 1 as it is
> on other mv64xxx implementations.
>
> I've contacted Allwinner about this and they have confir
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 06:05:35PM +0200, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
> Hey Hans,
>
> On 27-09-15 16:57, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >According to the datasheets to n factor for dividing the tclk is
> >2 to the power n on Allwinner SoCs, not 2 to the power n + 1 as it is
> >on other mv64xxx implementations
Hi,
On 27-09-15 18:53, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 06:05:35PM +0200, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
Hey Hans,
On 27-09-15 16:57, Hans de Goede wrote:
According to the datasheets to n factor for dividing the tclk is
2 to the power n on Allwinner SoCs, not 2 to the power n + 1 as it is
> "Hans" == Hans de Goede writes:
> According to the datasheets to n factor for dividing the tclk is
s/to/the/
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 06:05:35PM +0200, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
> Hey Hans,
>
> On 27-09-15 16:57, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >According to the datasheets to n factor for dividing the tclk is
> >2 to the power n on Allwinner SoCs, not 2 to the power n + 1 as it is
> >on other mv64xxx implementations
Hey Hans,
On 27-09-15 16:57, Hans de Goede wrote:
According to the datasheets to n factor for dividing the tclk is
2 to the power n on Allwinner SoCs, not 2 to the power n + 1 as it is
on other mv64xxx implementations.
Ah!
I've contacted Allwinner about this and they have confirmed that the
d
According to the datasheets to n factor for dividing the tclk is
2 to the power n on Allwinner SoCs, not 2 to the power n + 1 as it is
on other mv64xxx implementations.
I've contacted Allwinner about this and they have confirmed that the
datasheet is correct.
This commit fixes the clk-divider cal
14 matches
Mail list logo