On Thu, Mar 03 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 03 2005, Stuart Hayes wrote:
> >> I sent in this patch a few weeks ago, and never saw a response... I
> >> was wondering if there was a problem with it, or if I need to supply
> >> more info...? This patch is against
ide/pci/amd74xx: data structs point to __init text which should be
__devinit;
unless (a) these are going away real soon,
or (b) this just can't happen, isn't a real problem,
or (c) other ?
Error: ./drivers/ide/pci/amd74xx.o .data refers to 04d8 R_X86_64_64
.init.text+0x0
ide/pci/serverworks: data structs point to __init text
which should be __devinit;
unless (a) these are going away real soon,
or (b) this just can't happen, isn't a real problem,
or (c) other ?
Error: ./drivers/ide/pci/serverworks.o .data refers to 01e8
R_X86_64_64 .init.text
Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03 2005, Stuart Hayes wrote:
>> I sent in this patch a few weeks ago, and never saw a response... I
>> was wondering if there was a problem with it, or if I need to supply
>> more info...? This patch is against 2.6.11-rc3. It makes sure that
>> when
>> ide_atapi_er
On Thu, Mar 03 2005, Stuart Hayes wrote:
> I sent in this patch a few weeks ago, and never saw a response... I was
> wondering if there was a problem with it, or if I need to supply more
> info...? This patch is against 2.6.11-rc3. It makes sure that when
> ide_atapi_error() tries to end a fai
I sent in this patch a few weeks ago, and never saw a response... I was
wondering if there was a problem with it, or if I need to supply more
info...? This patch is against 2.6.11-rc3. It makes sure that when
ide_atapi_error() tries to end a failing ATAPI request after 2 reset
attempts by cal
Added a couple patches, and updated for 2.6.11-release.
BK users:
bk pull bk://gkernel.bkbits.net/libata-dev-2.6
or
bk pull bk://kernel.bkbits.net/jgarzik/libata-dev-2.6
Patch:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jgarzik/libata/2.6.11-libata-dev1.patch.bz
On Thu, Mar 03 2005, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 09:05:19 +0100, Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 03 2005, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 15:57:18 +0900, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hello, Jens.
> > > >
>
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 09:05:19 +0100, Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03 2005, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 15:57:18 +0900, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hello, Jens.
> > >
> > > Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 03 2005, Tejun Heo wro
On Thu, Mar 03 2005, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 15:57:18 +0900, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello, Jens.
> >
> > Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 03 2005, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello, Bartlomiej.
> > >>
> > >> This patch fixes ide_dma_intr() oo
On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 15:57:18 +0900, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, Jens.
>
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 03 2005, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >
> >> Hello, Bartlomiej.
> >>
> >> This patch fixes ide_dma_intr() oops which occurs for TASKFILE ioctl
> >>using DMA dataphses. This is aga
11 matches
Mail list logo