Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Just
about every free program on Linux keeps a configuration file in /etc.
They all fairly much carry the same format. It simply defies logic that
there would be no standard library to read this configuration file in.
"The nice thing about standards is that
there a
On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 23:28 +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Shaul Karl wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 07:46:24PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> >
> >
> >>There is no other explanation.
> >>
> >>Just about every free program on Linux keeps a configuration file in
> >>/etc. They all fairly
Nadav Har'El wrote:
One major difference in philosophy between the Windows registry and the
Unix /etc is that the former was never ever meant to be manually read
or modified by users, and the latter was mainly intended for manual
modification.
Don't get me wrong. Not for one second. I will not t
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote about "Re: I must be missing
something":
> > Does this standard library exists on other OSs?
>
> As was already mentioned, the Windows Registry.
> As far as I know, there are few such attempts also in various Unices.
> Some of them even became semi
Shaul Karl wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 07:46:24PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
There is no other explanation.
Just about every free program on Linux keeps a configuration file in
/etc. They all fairly much carry the same format. It simply defies
logic that there would be no standard librar
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 09:09:01PM +0200, Shaul Karl wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 07:46:24PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> > There is no other explanation.
> >
> > Just about every free program on Linux keeps a configuration file in
> > /etc. They all fairly much carry the same format. It s
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 07:46:24PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> There is no other explanation.
>
> Just about every free program on Linux keeps a configuration file in
> /etc. They all fairly much carry the same format. It simply defies
> logic that there would be no standard library to read
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005, Shachar Shemesh wrote about "I must be missing something":
> There is no other explanation.
>
> Just about every free program on Linux keeps a configuration file in
> /etc. They all fairly much carry the same format. It simply defies logic
> that there would be no standard
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
There is no other explanation.
Just about every free program on Linux keeps a configuration file in
/etc. They all fairly much carry the same format. It simply defies
logic that there would be no standard library to read this
configuration file in.
Anyone?
Shacha
There is no other explanation.
Just about every free program on Linux keeps a configuration file in
/etc. They all fairly much carry the same format. It simply defies logic
that there would be no standard library to read this configuration file in.
Anyone?
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lin
10 matches
Mail list logo