On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 07:52:16PM +0200, Omer Zak wrote:
> Therefore, AdSense is good for both them and the Web site owner.
You should note that not only will Amateur radio operators aka "Hams"
avoid your site, they will ask their family and friends to do so.
Geoff.
--
Geoffrey S. Mendelson, J
[This is a question, which really belongs more to the Hackers-IL mailing
list to Linux-IL, but the thread started here so I am continuing it in
the same mailing list. Apologies to those who are not interested in the
subject.
I am crossposting to both mailing lists, and suggest that those who are
i
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 07:38:01PM +0200, Rafi Gordon wrote:
> Thanks! !
>
> As I understand , a TLB flush is an expenive operation.
>
>Have anybody any idea if there is a TLB flush (on x86) when there is a
> context switch between two kernel threads ?
There isn't, both kernel threads are ru
Thanks! !
As I understand , a TLB flush is an expenive operation.
Have anybody any idea if there is a TLB flush (on x86) when there is a
context switch between two kernel threads ?
My guess is that there is no need for such a TLB flush (on x86) since
the kernel thread does not need to acce
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 12:02:12PM +0200, Rafi Gordon wrote:
> Is the cost , in terms of CPU , when there occurs a context switch
> between two kernel threads is the same as when
> there is a context switch between two user space threads ?
userspace threads are mapped to kernel threads in Linux (m
Hi,
Is the cost , in terms of CPU , when there occurs a context switch
between two kernel threads is the same as when
there is a context switch between two user space threads ?
Is this cost the same when there is a context switch between a kernel
thread and a user space thread ?
If you look at th
