any brandname machine with the right specs will do. a word of warning
though - don't hope to scale the specs, purchase the max set of
hardware you'll need right away - upgrades can be more expensive than
the machine itself.
If you expect to need more than a single server, maybe a beefy machine
tha
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 06:42:48PM +0300, Ira Abramov wrote:
> Quoting Yedidyah Bar-David, from the post of Wed, 15 Jun:
> > Did you try cp (or cp --sparse=always if you really want to) and
> > see if it helps? I don't know of a similar option for dd.
>
> I have here an image with partitions in it
Hi Everyone,
This is my new address (was *Josh*@*hadassah*.ac.il).
I searched the archives and only found a few answers to the
same request that I made in 2009.
I would appreciate any updated suggestions.
The server needs a good RAID 5 card and, if possible, a dual
and redundant power supply.
The b
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, geoffrey mendelson wrote:
No. It has to do with how USB is implemented in hardware. Almost every
motherboard I have seen only has 2 USB ports. Motherboards with 6 USB ports
on the back, and connectors for more on the front of the case still have only
2 USB ports, but they
i suggest you trace it. use blktrace.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Ira Abramov wrote:
> Quoting Yedidyah Bar-David, from the post of Wed, 15 Jun:
> >
> > Perhaps it uses USB1 and not 2?
>
> nope, I had that problem when I accidentally switched ports to a USB1
> port, the 22 minute burn took
Quoting Yedidyah Bar-David, from the post of Wed, 15 Jun:
>
> Perhaps it uses USB1 and not 2?
nope, I had that problem when I accidentally switched ports to a USB1
port, the 22 minute burn took over 113 minutes before I noticed it was
still writing and killed it.
also, to answer Geoff - nothing
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 04:19:08PM +0300, Ira Abramov wrote:
> First, an appology. I added another message on the RMS fiasco only to
> find out later the threads all died out and I was committing a faux pas.
> my appologies! please ignore I posted it if at all possible.
>
> Second, here's my probl
On Jun 15, 2011, at 4:19 PM, Ira Abramov wrote:
Second, here's my problem: I have here a workstation running an Athlon
3700+, and part of my job is to occasionally write out an image file
to
USB universal card reader, testing the product of my builds. The
writing
takes forever (since I haven
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:19:08 +0300
Ira Abramov wrote:
> First, an appology. I added another message on the RMS fiasco only to
> find out later the threads all died out and I was committing a faux pas.
> my appologies! please ignore I posted it if at all possible.
It's too late! You've done it no
On Wednesday 15 June 2011 at 16:18:42 (GMT+2) Erez D
wrote:
> 2011/6/15 Ira Abramov
>
> > Quoting geoffrey mendelson, from the post of Sun, 12 Jun:
> > > On Jun 12, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Uri Even-Chen wrote:
> > > >I don't agree with you, Geoff. What Richard Stallman does as a
> > > >private pers
On Wednesday 15 June 2011 at 15:56:03 (GMT+2) Ira Abramov wrote:
> Quoting geoffrey mendelson, from the post of Sun, 12 Jun:
> > On Jun 12, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Uri Even-Chen wrote:
> > >I don't agree with you, Geoff. What Richard Stallman does as a
> > >private person does not mean the FSF in invo
First, an appology. I added another message on the RMS fiasco only to
find out later the threads all died out and I was committing a faux pas.
my appologies! please ignore I posted it if at all possible.
Second, here's my problem: I have here a workstation running an Athlon
3700+, and part of my j
> I may act differently if the FSF boycotts israel.
Is the FSF not boycotting Israel? I guess it depends on how you see things,
but when Stallman signs on a letter as President of the FSF that he will
not come to Israel unless it is at a venue that sponsors an anti-Israel
boycott, I don't know wha
On Jun 15, 2011, at 3:14 PM, Ira Abramov wrote:
you know, there IS a logical falacy of guilt by association.
There may be, but there is a clear case here, RMS as president of the
FSF has, ex officio (from his office, meaning as the president, not
his desk) said that he was boycotting. Thi
Are you going to start that discussion again?
Everyone said their opinion and nothing new was added for quite a few emails
now.
Maybe we should just let it die out?
Ely
2011/6/15 Erez D
>
>
> 2011/6/15 Ira Abramov
>
>> Quoting geoffrey mendelson, from the post of Sun, 12 Jun:
>> >
>> > On Jun
2011/6/15 Ira Abramov
> Quoting geoffrey mendelson, from the post of Sun, 12 Jun:
> >
> > On Jun 12, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Uri Even-Chen wrote:
> > >
> > >I don't agree with you, Geoff. What Richard Stallman does as a
> > >private person does not mean the FSF in involved. As a private
> > >person Ri
Quoting geoffrey mendelson, from the post of Sun, 12 Jun:
>
> On Jun 12, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Uri Even-Chen wrote:
> >
> >I don't agree with you, Geoff. What Richard Stallman does as a
> >private person does not mean the FSF in involved. As a private
> >person Richard Stallman has the right to boyco
17 matches
Mail list logo
