Re: How to create a persistant Knoppix image

2005-06-02 Thread Kobi Cohen-Arazi
BTW, That may interest you if you are in the knoppix thing ... http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/knoppixhks/ Its a great one. Kobi.On 6/2/05, Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all,I want to create a knoppix "installation". I want more than the homedirectory saved, I want to apt-get inst

Re: Ftp Access.

2005-04-02 Thread Kobi Cohen-Arazi
BTW, You can always use the debian way of building a kernel from the sources, using make-kpkg.That way you can make sure the ACL is enabled.http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.htmlThe problem is not necessary if you use the latest kernel or not. The question is do you have ACL enable

Re: how to do "mv ---123.jpg 123.jpg "

2005-03-15 Thread Kobi Cohen-Arazi
mv -- ---123.jpg 123.jpg On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:50:13 +0200, Kfir Lavi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > Here is the problem: > mv ---123.jpg 123.jpg > mv: unrecognized option `---123.jpg' > Try `mv --help' for more information. > > I have tried a lot of things but to no avail. > > kfir > >

Fwd: Speed up Firefox by pipelining http requests

2005-02-06 Thread Kobi Cohen-Arazi
http://christopher.aillon.org/blog/dev/mozilla/20050105-pipelining.html On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 13:34:50 +0200, Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Danny Lieberman wrote: > > > Firefox installation default is to make one http request at a time. > > When you enable pipelining it will make sev

Re: C++ problem

2005-01-29 Thread Kobi Cohen-Arazi
Yes, explicit keyword is here long time ago. Get a C++ book from more details. At the moment, C++ decides that binding a non-const ref to a temporary is wrong. Thats the problem. Kobi. On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 23:04:52 +0200 (EET), Omer Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, Shac

Re: Debian Sarge and epoll patch

2005-01-24 Thread Kobi Cohen-Arazi
the use of new upstream > version on 30/11/2002 which got the package name of kernel-image-2.4.20. > http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.4.27-i386/kernel-image-2.4.27-i386_2.4.27-6/changelog > > so the answer is yes... > > Kobi Cohen-Arazi wrote: > > Hi

Debian Sarge and epoll patch

2005-01-17 Thread Kobi Cohen-Arazi
Hi all, I'm using Debian Sarge with 2.4.27 kernel. Is there any way to know whether that kernel is already patched with the epoll patch ? Thanks in advance, Kobi. = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsub

Re: Maximum memory reported by /proc/meminfo in vanilla 2.4.26

2004-11-14 Thread Kobi Cohen-Arazi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 03:43:18PM +0200, Kobi Cohen-Arazi wrote: > > > Hi Muli, > > > > Thanks for your reply. > > In case I dont use CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G, is 3.3GB reported seems to be > > OK ? > > It seems somewhat shor

Re: Maximum memory reported by /proc/meminfo in vanilla 2.4.26

2004-11-14 Thread Kobi Cohen-Arazi
Hi Muli, Thanks for your reply. In case I dont use CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G, is 3.3GB reported seems to be OK ? Kobi. On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 15:40:22 +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 03:22:20PM +0200, Kobi Cohen-Arazi wrote: > > Hi all, > &

Maximum memory reported by /proc/meminfo in vanilla 2.4.26

2004-11-14 Thread Kobi Cohen-Arazi
Hi all, Given an 8 GB RAM, what is the maximum of the memory I should expect reported from /proc/meminfo ? I'm using 2.4.26 Vanilla Right now I can see ~3.3GB when cat-ing /proc/meminfo on that specific machine. Thanks in advance, Kobi. ==

Bootng a live cd from usb cdrom

2004-10-22 Thread Kobi Cohen-Arazi
Hi all, Is there anyone over here that came accross a live cd distribution that can boot from usb cdrom ? On my eServer BladeCenter - the usb seems to be a use device, and I'm tyring to find a decent live cd that can be run from. I've tried Suse 9.1 with no luck Thanks, Kobi. =

ulimit -c unlimited - Operation not permitted

2004-10-14 Thread Kobi Cohen-Arazi
Hi all, I'm using Suse 9.0 2.4.21-144-default I'm having a problem raising my core size limits.Its an awkward situation : When I first created my account, everything went OK. Meaning, I could do ulimit -c unlimited However after a week or so, When trying to do the same, I get: bash: ulimit: core f

Re: kernel bug in inode.c in shutdown

2004-10-12 Thread Kobi Cohen-Arazi
Hi all, On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 21:22:39 +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 08:59:56PM +0200, guy keren wrote: > > > > On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Kobi Cohen-Arazi wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I got "

kernel bug in inode.c in shutdown

2004-10-12 Thread Kobi Cohen-Arazi
Hi, I got "kernel bug" message while shutdown. There was a data dumped. However, I didn't know how to preserve that dump. Is it flushed to some file, so users can retrieve it later for reporting bugs, debugging the kernel etc ? Thanks, Kobi. =

[Fwd: Re: Digital Camera and usb connector on Mandrake 10]

2004-08-03 Thread Kobi Cohen-Arazi
-Forwarded Message- From: Kobi Cohen-Arazi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Offer Kaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Digital Camera and usb connector on Mandrake 10 Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 09:49:24 +0300 Bingo. Thats what I've done 1st thing in the morning. I've urpmi

Digital Camera and usb connector on Mandrake 10

2004-08-01 Thread Kobi Cohen-Arazi
Hi all, Mandrake 10, with kernel 2.6 I have Olympus c-750UZ and I'm trying to make it work with Mdk 10. It worked OK with 9.2 I've tried everything I know/can but maybe I've missed something that you guys (and girls) can help me out. I did makedev /dev after installing the system (Just FYI, I don

Re: read(2) and write(2) atomicy?

2004-07-20 Thread Kobi Cohen-Arazi
On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 17:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Again we are talking about threads. The are no need to copy > data to kernel, and than copy it back. So it will bot be faster at all. It is *much* faster than using semaphores, I've checked it. And yes - I could hardly believe it myself ;-)

Re: read(2) and write(2) atomicy?

2004-07-20 Thread Kobi Cohen-Arazi
On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 15:18, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > Dvir Volk wrote: > > > fifo's must be thread safe, because they support communication between > > a number of processes. > > but if all the threads are in the same process, and there's so little > > data per read/write, why not use a queue in

Re: read(2) and write(2) atomicy?

2004-07-20 Thread Kobi Cohen-Arazi
Hi Shachar, Have you considered using Unix domain sockets with DGRAM ? Unix domain sockets as far as I understand, will be reliable even with DGRAM, which allow you to benefit from the message oriented protocol. There is only one gotchas here, the enqueuing threads need to make sure they can queu