Yes, we also want to take advantage of the option to expand capacity,
but even just for purposes of smoother fail-over (i.e. shorter down
time, actually zero down time as far as the server's availability is
concerned) I see the advantage of db-level replication over DRBD.
(sorry for top posting. M
"Amos Shapira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BUT now that we are finally moving from DNS-based fail-over (due to
> lack of Virtual IP support in the hosting product we originally had)
> to Virtual-IP (using Linux Virtual Server) we see how MySQL
> master-master replication (using simple two-sided
2008/9/22 Oleg Goldshmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Noam Rathaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I'm also not interested in replies telling me there's a project that
>> does exactly that (and only requires a few tiny customizations that
>> will take days).
>
> Well, how about a couple of hours, inclu
I've set up a system just like this and it's been up for over a year happily
chugging along...
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Oleg Goldshmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Noam Rathaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm also not interested in replies telling me there's a project that
> > does
Noam Rathaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm also not interested in replies telling me there's a project that
> does exactly that (and only requires a few tiny customizations that
> will take days).
Well, how about a couple of hours, including RTFM? LinuxHA (heartbeat,
http://www.linux-ha.org)
Hi,
We are looking for someone to implement a warm-failover, where our existing
MySQL, Apache and Linux based system will have complete and immediate
failover (two identical servers either working in parallel or one kicking
into action when the second one fails, all the while replicating).
Obj
