Quoth Oleg Goldshmidt on Tue, Feb 25, 2003:
Omer Zak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there anything, which is original Israeli, and which is offered to
gullible people to test their gullibility?
The network bridge developed by an Israeli startup perfectly
positioned to take over the dark
Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, Feb 24, 2003:
yes, certainly, I'm aware of make -j 3, but two
separate projects which look at different files and parts of the
disk (causing lots of head skips, cache threshing etc)?
The compiler run, from system resources usage point of view, is
consisting of
Vadim Vygonets [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From what I understood, people are complaining that icc takes
more time to compile the same files than gcc.
It makes sense to me that a compiler that optimizes better with take
more time.
--
Oleg Goldshmidt | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoth Oleg Goldshmidt on Tue, Feb 25, 2003:
Vadim Vygonets [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From what I understood, people are complaining that icc takes
more time to compile the same files than gcc.
It makes sense to me that a compiler that optimizes better with take
more time.
Yes, it's
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 16:59, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Vadim Vygonets [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From what I understood, people are complaining that icc takes
more time to compile the same files than gcc.
It makes sense to me that a compiler that optimizes better with take
more time.
But
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 12:48:34PM +0200, Michael Sternberg wrote:
Somebody tried Intel C++ Compiler 7.0 for Linux ?
http://www.programmersparadise.com/Product.pasp?txtCatalog=ParadisetxtCategory=txtProductID=I23+0A12
Good article about it here:
24 2003, 12:51, Muli Ben-Yehuda :
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 12:48:34PM +0200, Michael Sternberg wrote:
Somebody tried Intel C++ Compiler 7.0 for Linux ?
http://www.programmersparadise.com/Product.pasp?txtCatalog=ParadisetxtCate
gory=txtProductID=I23+0A12
Good article about it here:
They claim 30% performance gain on gcc 3.2..
I've read (don't remember the source, sorry, maybe lkml) that
snapshot gcc from CVS is closing the gap quickly.
My only gripe is that the compile speed itself is SSLLOOWWW... compiling X11
CVS + KDE CVS at the same time is a great way to see
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 01:19:55PM +0200, Hetz Ben-Hamo wrote:
My only gripe is that the compile speed itself is
SSLLOOWWW... compiling X11 CVS + KDE CVS at the same time is a
great way to see how to bring your CPU to it's knees..
I prefer fast generated code to faster compile times. How
]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 1:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Intel compiler vs. gcc
They claim 30% performance gain on gcc 3.2..
I've read (don't remember the source, sorry, maybe lkml) that
snapshot gcc from CVS is closing the gap quickly.
My
tried to do the same (compile X11 and KDE CVS's at
the same time) with the GNU gcc and got better results?
-Original Message-
From: Hetz Ben-Hamo
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 1:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Intel compiler vs
. Slow compared to what? gcc in the same situation?
Just trying to watch and learn...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 2:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Intel compiler vs. gcc
Aren't we missing something here: The $305.99 price tag.
Oh, and let's not forget that dear old open source GCC can function as a
full cross compiler which also costs. We're stuck with Intel for now,
but who knows what we'll be using in a few years from now? Anyone
remember DEC, DG, Interdata
: Monday, February 24, 2003 4:15 PM
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Intel compiler vs. gcc
Aren't we missing something here: The $305.99 price tag.
Oh, and let's not forget that dear old open source GCC can
function as a
full cross compiler which also costs. We're stuck with Intel
that depends that the configure script, Makefile, automake, or whatever
the package is using supports it.
I have had a lot of head heck to port open-software to HP recently, and
I know that many times you have to edit many files in the source in
order to force them respect your env.vars.
Noam
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 16:14, Daniel Feiglin wrote:
Aren't we missing something here: The $305.99 price tag.
Oh, and let's not forget that dear old open source GCC can function as a
full cross compiler which also costs. We're stuck with Intel for now,
but who knows what we'll be using in a
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 06:59:33PM +0200, Noam Meltzer wrote:
(and thats assuming that the utility is written in such a way so every
compiler will be able to compile it.
but considering the amount of warnings in the source of everything
(including kernel+qt+kde+gnome, and every thing
On 24 Feb 2003, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
Price tag isn't the issue - not be able to ever fix bugs is - or do you
believe there are no bugsin the Intel compiler (not that I have ever
worked with it)? if so I have a bridge here I'd be interested to sell
you... :-)
Wasn't that bridge broken few
Omer Zak wrote:
On 24 Feb 2003, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
Price tag isn't the issue - not be able to ever fix bugs is - or do you
believe there are no bugsin the Intel compiler (not that I have ever
worked with it)? if so I have a bridge here I'd be interested to sell
you... :-)
Wasn't that
Omer Zak wrote:
On 24 Feb 2003, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
Price tag isn't the issue - not be able to ever fix bugs is - or do you
believe there are no bugsin the Intel compiler (not that I have ever
worked with it)? if so I have a bridge here I'd be interested to sell
you... :-)
Wasn't
On 24 Feb 2003 17:05:48 +0200
Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# grep processors /var/log/dmesg
Total of 64 processors activated (76359.40 BogoMIPS).
Have you put your Altix-3000 on the linux-il used equipment list
(together with Marc's Sparcs?)
I'll be
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Daniel Feiglin wrote:
Aren't we missing something here: The $305.99 price tag.
Oh, and let's not forget that dear old open source GCC can function as a
full cross compiler which also costs. We're stuck with Intel for now,
but who knows what we'll be using in a few years
Omer Zak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there anything, which is original Israeli, and which is offered to
gullible people to test their gullibility?
The network bridge developed by an Israeli startup perfectly
positioned to take over the dark fiber?
--
Oleg Goldshmidt | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
23 matches
Mail list logo
