-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
áéåí øáéòé, 6 áðåáîáø 2002, 20:11, Eran Tromer ëúá òì 'Re: Rootless
Cygwin/XFree86':
Ira Abramov wrote:
why isn't it cheap to access win from lin? I have done it several
times with TightVNC clients, as well as with the windows RDP client
(both
Oded Arbel wrote:
TightVNC is quite usable on a non-dedicated ISDN connection (i.e. -
other things are using it at the same time), so I believe it will be
very responsive on a LAN.
I also used the vncviewer from ATT and the krdc from KDE 3.1 and
they're both usable on low bandwidth
for Microsoft
Windows, Macintosh, and other OSs you can find quite a comprehensive list of
X servers. maybe one of them is right for you.
áéåí ùéùé, 8 áðåáîáø 2002, 19:26, ëúáú òì 'Re: Rootless Cygwin/XFree86':
Hi,
Point taken, but I think this one has an indirect but significant
relevance to Linux
Recently, there is an old-new alternative, which had not been serious
until recently: VNC.
VNC technologies made a big leap in the last year, and are really
viable for many uses that had demanded pure X in the past.
If you control both of the sides (the UNIX side AND the Windows side),
you
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 04:47:43AM +0200, Eran Tromer wrote:
Some time ago I consulted this list about good X servers for Windows
(it's easier and far cheaper to access Linux from Windows than the
reverse; I need both).
This what happens when you're open - people pay the competetion in order
Ira Abramov wrote:
why isn't it cheap to access win from lin? I have done it several
times with TightVNC clients, as well as with the windows RDP client
(both are packages on Debian's main tree, apt-get install rdesktop
xvncviewer)
I find VNC way too slow and jumpy for extensive work, which
Greetings,
Some time ago I consulted this list about good X servers for Windows
(it's easier and far cheaper to access Linux from Windows than the
reverse; I need both). Back then, the conclusion was that there is no
satisfactory free solution, so I've been using Starnet's X-Win32 [1].
Well,
