On Thursday 25 June 2009 16:52:11 Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi Shlomi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 04:20:00PM +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > Replying to myself, I'd like to note that I recently fixed some build
> > problems in the Freecell Solver distribution, and after I was through,
> > MSVC now gener
Hi Shlomi,
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 04:20:00PM +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Replying to myself, I'd like to note that I recently fixed some build
> problems in the Freecell Solver distribution, and after I was through, MSVC
> now generates a larger .dll file, comparable in size to the gcc -Os one -
Hi all!
On Thursday 11 June 2009 16:59:32 Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Based on the gcc-4.4.0 (with -Os) / x86-Linux shared library sizes here:
>
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fc-solve-discuss/message/998
>
> And the Visual C++/Win32 (also x86) .dll sizes here:
>
> http://tech.groups.ya
On Thursday 11 June 2009 16:59:32 Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Based on the gcc-4.4.0 (with -Os) / x86-Linux shared library sizes here:
>
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fc-solve-discuss/message/998
>
> And the Visual C++/Win32 (also x86) .dll sizes here:
>
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/g
On Sunday 14 June 2009 16:33:17 Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009, Shlomi Fish wrote about "Re: Why is GNU/Linux so
Bloated?":
> > I've compared the size of the Linux .so file (after -Os and strip) to the
> > size of the Windows MSVC-generated .dll
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009, Shlomi Fish wrote about "Re: Why is GNU/Linux so
Bloated?":
> I've compared the size of the Linux .so file (after -Os and strip) to the
> size
> of the Windows MSVC-generated .dll.
>
> With gcc -Os before strip - 86,464 bytes
> same after
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Shachar Shemesh writes:
I'm not sure whether base addresses are allocated randomly or
something else is at work here, but collisions are not that common.
You can manually rebase a DLL at post-link time, and I think that DLLs
shipped by commercial vendors (such
On Friday 12 June 2009 00:13:45 Ori Berger wrote:
> Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > I've compared the size of the Linux .so file (after -Os and strip) to the
> > size of the Windows MSVC-generated .dll.
> >
> > With gcc -Os before strip - 86,464 bytes
> > same after strip - 74,584
> >
> > With gcc -Os that
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:21:56AM +0300, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> Shachar Shemesh writes:
>
> > I'm not sure whether base addresses are allocated randomly or
> > something else is at work here, but collisions are not that common.
>
> You can manually rebase a DLL at post-link time,
On Linux y
Shachar Shemesh writes:
> I'm not sure whether base addresses are allocated randomly or
> something else is at work here, but collisions are not that common.
You can manually rebase a DLL at post-link time, and I think that DLLs
shipped by commercial vendors (such as MS :) have precomputed base
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
If a process
is linked against several libraries all but one need to be
relocated to other free addresses,
No, this statement is very far from the truth. I have worked quite a lot
with DLLs, and very rarely saw the linker message saying that two DLLs
require overl
Shlomi Fish wrote:
I've compared the size of the Linux .so file (after -Os and strip) to the size
of the Windows MSVC-generated .dll.
With gcc -Os before strip - 86,464 bytes
same after strip - 74,584
With gcc -Os that can solve Freecell only - before strip: 71,440
After strip - 60,312
Now
On Thursday 11 June 2009 22:22:13 Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> Shlomi Fish writes:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > Based on the gcc-4.4.0 (with -Os) / x86-Linux shared library sizes
> > here:
> >
> > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fc-solve-discuss/message/998
> >
> > And the Visual C++/Win32 (also x86) .dll s
Shlomi Fish writes:
> Hi all!
>
> Based on the gcc-4.4.0 (with -Os) / x86-Linux shared library sizes
> here:
>
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fc-solve-discuss/message/998
>
> And the Visual C++/Win32 (also x86) .dll sizes here:
>
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fc-solve-discuss/message
Hi all!
Based on the gcc-4.4.0 (with -Os) / x86-Linux shared library sizes here:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fc-solve-discuss/message/998
And the Visual C++/Win32 (also x86) .dll sizes here:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/fc-solve-discuss/message/999
My question is: why are the Visu
15 matches
Mail list logo
