Re: Administrivia (was Re: äöòä äòöä)

1999-03-31 Thread Vadim Vygonets
Quoth Uri Bruck on Wed, Mar 31, 1999: > On Tue, 30 Mar 1999, Vadim Vygonets wrote: > > So? Should I setup digests to be sent nightly? > > Nightly works for me. Sure it works. So it seems to me that most people will be happy with nightly (Ira: daily) digests. If nobody objects, I'll leave it l

Re: Administrivia (was Re: äöòä äòöä)

1999-03-31 Thread Uri Bruck
On Tue, 30 Mar 1999, Vadim Vygonets wrote: > Quoth Evgeny Stambulchik on Tue, Mar 30, 1999: > > Vadim Vygonets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 64KB seems to be one day (or less) on this list. > > > > You're right, it's about 100K a day during the last couple of months. > > So? Should I set

Re: Administrivia (was Re: äöòä äòöä )

1999-03-30 Thread Vadim Vygonets
Quoth Shachar Tal on Tue, Mar 30, 1999: > My opinion is that digests should be sent at 22:00 (if the time can be > configured, that is...) It can be configured, although I perfer the night, because at 22:00 this list and this mailserver are still busy. The nightly jobs run at 3:10am here, and th

Re: Administrivia (was Re: äöòä äòöä )

1999-03-30 Thread Shachar Tal
At 18:27 30/03/99 +0200, Vadim Vygonets wrote: >Quoth Evgeny Stambulchik on Tue, Mar 30, 1999: >> Vadim Vygonets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > So? Should I setup digests to be sent nightly? >> >> It's fine with me. > >Agreed. If nobody objects. I prefer it to be just before 22:00. Some

Re: Administrivia (was Re: äöòä äòöä)

1999-03-30 Thread Adam Morrison
Vadim Vygonets wrote: > > Another suggestion: make submissions allowed only to the list subscribers. > > Of course I'll do it. Please reconsider. Spam does suck, but there are other methods of dealing with it, and this prevents several common configurations from using the list.

Re: Administrivia (was Re: äöòä äòöä)

1999-03-30 Thread Vadim Vygonets
Quoth Evgeny Stambulchik on Tue, Mar 30, 1999: > Vadim Vygonets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So? Should I setup digests to be sent nightly? > > It's fine with me. Agreed. If nobody objects. > Another suggestion: make submissions allowed only to the list subscribers. Of course I'll do i

Re: Re[2]: Administrivia (was Re: äöòä äòöä)

1999-03-30 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
Evgeny Stambulchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Another suggestion: make submissions allowed only to the list > subscribers. This will eliminate the spam, as well as stupid > auto-confirmation messages we had trouble with some time ago. Unfortunately, the auto-confirmation messages went direc

Re[2]: Administrivia (was Re: äöòä äòöä)

1999-03-30 Thread Evgeny Stambulchik
Vadim Vygonets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So? Should I setup digests to be sent nightly? It's fine with me. > but do HTML messages actually > arrive to this list? They do at times. Another suggestion: make submissions allowed only to the list subscribers. This will eliminate the spam, a

Re: Administrivia (was Re: äöòä äòöä)

1999-03-30 Thread Vadim Vygonets
Quoth Evgeny Stambulchik on Tue, Mar 30, 1999: > Vadim Vygonets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 64KB seems to be one day (or less) on this list. > > You're right, it's about 100K a day during the last couple of months. So? Should I setup digests to be sent nightly? > > I can also set the opti

Re[2]: Administrivia (was Re: äöòä äòöä)

1999-03-30 Thread Evgeny Stambulchik
Vadim Vygonets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 64KB seems to be one day (or less) on this list. You're right, it's about 100K a day during the last couple of months. > > Also (not actually related), I'd like everyone to use plain text > messages > > instead of HTML. > > I can also set the o

Re: Administrivia (was Re: äöòä äòöä)

1999-03-30 Thread Vadim Vygonets
People, tell me what you think please. Quoth Evgeny Stambulchik on Tue, Mar 30, 1999: > Vadim Vygonets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The list will finally support digests, but I'll need to discuss > > the configuration with you. > > I suggest 64KB and 3 days (either of conditions is enough

Re: Administrivia (was Re: äöòä äòöä)

1999-03-30 Thread Evgeny Stambulchik
Vadim Vygonets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The list will finally support digests, but I'll need to discuss > the configuration with you. The digests can be sent either every > X days (say, a week, a month, or something), or after it grows to > some size (1MB), or both (every week, unless it

Re: Administrivia (was Re: äöòä äòöä)

1999-03-30 Thread Jonathan Ben-Avraham
On Tue, 30 Mar 1999, Vadim Vygonets wrote: > Hi there, List. > > As almost none of you know, I'm the postmaster of the box on > which this list runs. I'm not really reading this list, though, > so if you want to contact me personally, just do it. I'll read > this thread, though. > > Administr

Administrivia (was Re: äöòä äòöä)

1999-03-29 Thread Vadim Vygonets
Hi there, List. As almost none of you know, I'm the postmaster of the box on which this list runs. I'm not really reading this list, though, so if you want to contact me personally, just do it. I'll read this thread, though. Administrivia Aleph === I'm planning to migrate all