New attempt... Also attached it if the inlined patched gets corrupted.
commit 0ba8785483c2ee7f56e8f242e000f6cd17a7da40
Author: Johann Deneux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat Mar 17 22:23:44 2007 +0100
iforce: Use usb_kill_urb instead of usb_unlink_urb.
Using usb_unlink_urb can cause iforce
Hi Johann,
On Saturday 17 March 2007 17:43, johann deneux wrote:
> commit 0ba8785483c2ee7f56e8f242e000f6cd17a7da40
> Author: Johann Deneux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat Mar 17 22:23:44 2007 +0100
I tried applying your patch but it appears that your mailer mangled it.
Could you please resend i
Hi Dmitry,
On 3/18/07, Dmitry Torokhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Johann,
On Saturday 17 March 2007 17:50, johann deneux wrote:
> A note about that patch: Apparently Anders Fugmann submitted a patch to use
> usb_kill_urb to linux-usb-devel for version 2.6.10.
> I don't know if this patch got
Hi Johann,
On Saturday 17 March 2007 17:50, johann deneux wrote:
> A note about that patch: Apparently Anders Fugmann submitted a patch to use
> usb_kill_urb to linux-usb-devel for version 2.6.10.
> I don't know if this patch got lost, or if it was rejected.
Since every other USB dirver uses usb_
A note about that patch: Apparently Anders Fugmann submitted a patch to use
usb_kill_urb to linux-usb-devel for version 2.6.10.
I don't know if this patch got lost, or if it was rejected.
On 3/17/07, johann deneux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
commit 0ba8785483c2ee7f56e8f242e000f6cd17a7da40
Author
commit 0ba8785483c2ee7f56e8f242e000f6cd17a7da40
Author: Johann Deneux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat Mar 17 22:23:44 2007 +0100
iforce: Use usb_kill_urb instead of usb_unlink_urb.
Using usb_unlink_urb can cause iforce_open to fail when called soon
after iforce_release.
Also updated my
